Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), was a ruling that determined the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required states to provide just compensation for seizing private property.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), was a ruling that determined the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required states to provide just compensation for seizing private property. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Field, Gray, Brown, Shiras, White, Peckham (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago (en)
|
Holding
| - The 14th Amendment's due process clause requires that states provide fair compensation for seizing private property. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), was a ruling that determined the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required states to provide just compensation for seizing private property. (en)
|
ArgueDateA
| |
ArgueDateB
| |
googlescholar
| |
NotParticipating
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |