Carson v. Makin, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Free Exercise Clause. It was a follow-up to Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - Carson v. Makin, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Free Exercise Clause. It was a follow-up to Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- David Carson, as Parent and Next Friend of O. C., et al. v. A. Pender Makin, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
Dissent
| - Sotomayor (en)
- Breyer (en)
|
docket
| |
JoinDissent
| |
JoinMajority
| - Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
OralArgument
| |
oyez
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - David Carson, as Parent and Next Friend of O. C., et al. v. A. Pender Makin, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education (en)
|
Holding
| - Maine's "nonsectarian" requirement for the otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| |
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Carson v. Makin, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Free Exercise Clause. It was a follow-up to Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The case centered on the limits of school vouchers offered by the state of Maine, which had disallowed the vouchers to be used to pay for religious-based private schools. In a 6–3 decision the Court ruled that Maine's restrictions on vouchers violated the Free Exercise Clause, as they discriminated against religious-backed private schools. The minority opinions argued that the decision worked against the long-standing principle of the separation of church and state, since state governments would now be required to fund religious institutions. (en)
|
Opinion
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |