Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- John J. Davis, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (en)
- Willie Earl Carr, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
docket
| |
JoinMajority
| - Roberts, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh; Thomas, Gorsuch, Barrett ; Breyer (en)
|
LawsApplied
| |
OralArgument
| |
oyez
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - John J. Davis, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (en)
- Willie Earl Carr, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (en)
|
Holding
| - A petitioner need not challenge the constitutionality of an agency's structure under the Appointments Clause in an internal agency administrative proceeding in order to present that challenge in court on appeal. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| |
majority
| |
other source
| |
other url
| |
has abstract
| - Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause. (en)
|
Concurrence
| |
JoinConcurrence
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |