Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding a state anti-plug molding law preempted because it partially duplicated and therefore interfered with the balance Congress had struck by federal patent law. The decision reaffirmed the Supreme Court's earlier decision in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. (1964), which held a state unfair competition law preempted on the same ground.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding a state anti-plug molding law preempted because it partially duplicated and therefore interfered with the balance Congress had struck by federal patent law. The decision reaffirmed the Supreme Court's earlier decision in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. (1964), which held a state unfair competition law preempted on the same ground. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| |
LawsApplied
| |
oyez
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| |
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
fullname
| - Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. (en)
|
Holding
| - The Florida statute is preempted by the Supremacy Clause, because it partially duplicated and therefore interfered with federal patent law. (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding a state anti-plug molding law preempted because it partially duplicated and therefore interfered with the balance Congress had struck by federal patent law. The decision reaffirmed the Supreme Court's earlier decision in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. (1964), which held a state unfair competition law preempted on the same ground. (en)
|
googlescholar
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |