This HTML5 document contains 114 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n8https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://www.oyez.org/cases/1975/
n14https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n6https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/323709/lloyd-charles-powell-v-w-t-stone-warden/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Burger_Court
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
dbr:Mancusi_v._DeForte
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
dbr:Kimmelman_v._Morrison
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
dbr:Withrow_v._Williams
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
dbr:Rice–Poindexter_case
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
dbr:Stone_v_Powell
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
rdf:type
dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase owl:Thing dbo:Case wikidata:Q2334719
rdfs:label
Stone v. Powell
rdfs:comment
Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976), was decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that limited which claims of Fourth Amendment violations could be made by state prisoners in habeas corpus petitions in federal courts. Specifically, a claim that the exclusionary rule had been broken would be barred if state courts had already given it a full and fair hearing. The decision combined two cases that were argued before the Supreme Court on the same day with similar issues, one filed by Lloyd Powell (convicted of murder in California) and the other, titled Wolff v. Rice, filed by David Rice (convicted of murder in Nebraska).
foaf:name
Stone, Warden, v. Powell; Wolff, Warden, v. Rice
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1976_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbc:United_States_habeas_corpus_case_law dbc:Law_enforcement_in_the_United_States dbc:Prisoners'_and_ex-prisoners'_rights dbc:Legal_history_of_California dbc:Legal_history_of_Nebraska
dbo:wikiPageID
68346501
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1063285150
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Lewis_F._Powell_Jr. dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:United_States_v._Calandra dbr:Papachristou_v._City_of_Jacksonville dbr:Warren_E._Burger dbr:Gouled_v._United_States dbr:Harmless_error dbr:California_Courts_of_Appeal dbr:Weeks_v._United_States dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eighth_Circuit dbr:San_Bernardino,_California dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:Exclusionary_rule dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_habeas_corpus_case_law dbc:1976_in_the_United_States dbr:Mapp_v._Ohio dbr:Frank_v._Mangum dbr:Kaufman_v._United_States dbc:Prisoners'_and_ex-prisoners'_rights dbr:Habeas_corpus_in_the_United_States dbc:Law_enforcement_in_the_United_States dbr:Suppression_of_evidence dbr:Certiorari dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Douglas_County,_Nebraska dbr:William_J._Brennan_Jr. dbc:Legal_history_of_California dbr:Thurgood_Marshall dbr:Byron_White dbr:Omaha,_Nebraska dbc:Legal_history_of_Nebraska dbr:Nebraska_Supreme_Court dbr:Supreme_Court_of_California dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbr:Chapman_v._California dbr:Warren_Keith_Urbom dbr:Henderson,_Nevada dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Nebraska
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n6: n8:scholar_case%3Fcase=8812649088309702751 n8:scholar_case%3Fcase=9463247502563897701 n8:scholar_case%3Fcase=5051788405535559672 n16:74-1055
owl:sameAs
n14:FsM5J wikidata:Q108085525
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_US_Supreme_Court_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Blockquote dbt:Main
dbp:dissent
Brennan White
dbp:docket
74
dbp:joindissent
Marshall
dbp:joinmajority
Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist, and Stevens
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Habeas_corpus_in_the_United_States dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oralargument
n16:74-1055
dbp:parallelcitations
17280.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
465
dbp:usvol
428
dbp:arguedate
0001-02-24
dbp:argueyear
1976
dbp:decidedate
0001-07-06
dbp:decideyear
1976
dbp:fullname
Stone, Warden, v. Powell; Wolff, Warden, v. Rice
dbp:holding
If a state prisoner's claim as to a violation of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule has already been given a full and fair hearing by state courts, it may not be heard by federal courts in a habeas corpus petition.
dbp:litigants
Stone v. Powell; Wolff v. Rice
dbp:majority
Powell
dbp:source
Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. at 509, Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. at 490
dbp:text
The costs of applying the exclusionary rule even at trial and on direct review are well known: the focus of the trial, and the attention of the participants therein, are diverted from the ultimate question of guilt or innocence that should be the central concern in a criminal proceeding. Moreover, the physical evidence sought to be excluded is typically reliable and often the most probative information bearing on the guilt or innocence of the defendant. As Mr. Justice Black emphasized in his dissent in Kaufman: "A claim of illegal search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment is crucially different from many other constitutional rights; ordinarily the evidence seized can in no way have been rendered untrustworthy by the means of its seizure and indeed often this evidence alone establishes beyond virtually any shadow of a doubt that the defendant is guilty." Application of the rule thus deflects the truthfinding process and often frees the guilty. The disparity in particular cases between the error committed by the police officer and the windfall afforded a guilty defendant by application of the rule is contrary to the idea of proportionality that is essential to the concept of justice. Thus, although the rule is thought to deter unlawful police activity in part through the nurturing of respect for Fourth Amendment values, if applied indiscriminately it may well have the opposite effect of generating disrespect for the law and administration of justice. Under Mapp, as a matter of federal constitutional law, a state court must exclude evidence from the trial of an individual whose Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by a search or seizure that directly or indirectly resulted in the acquisition of that evidence. As United States v. Calandra reaffirmed, "evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure." When a state court admits such evidence, it has committed a constitutional error. . .
dbo:abstract
Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976), was decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that limited which claims of Fourth Amendment violations could be made by state prisoners in habeas corpus petitions in federal courts. Specifically, a claim that the exclusionary rule had been broken would be barred if state courts had already given it a full and fair hearing. The decision combined two cases that were argued before the Supreme Court on the same day with similar issues, one filed by Lloyd Powell (convicted of murder in California) and the other, titled Wolff v. Rice, filed by David Rice (convicted of murder in Nebraska).
dbp:concurrence
Burger
dbp:scotus
1976
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Stone_v._Powell?oldid=1063285150&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
17699
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
dbr:428_U.S._465
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
dbr:Wolff_v._Rice
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Stone_v._Powell
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Stone_v._Powell
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Stone_v._Powell