This HTML5 document contains 91 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n14http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n10https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n13http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
dbpedia-zhhttp://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Patrick_Hastings
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth
Subject Item
dbr:Rigby_Swift
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth
Subject Item
dbr:Handel_Booth
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth
Subject Item
dbr:Gruban
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth
dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth
Subject Item
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
格鲁班诉布斯案 Gruban v Booth
rdfs:comment
Gruban v Booth was a 1917 fraud case in England that generated significant publicity because the defendant, Frederick Handel Booth, was a Member of Parliament. Gruban was a German-born businessman who ran several factories that made tools for manufacturing munitions for the First World War. In an effort to find government contracts and money to expand his business, he contacted a businessman and MP, Frederick Handel Booth, who willingly promised both. Booth sought agreement from Gruban to have 10% of a large order's price, to be hidden from the rest of the Board; tricked Gruban into transferring the company, and had him interned under wartime regulations to prevent a claim against him. 格鲁班诉布斯案（英語：Gruban v Booth）是1917年在英國發生的一起欺詐案，由於被告人是一位英國國會議員，因此該起案件引起了很大關注。案件原告格魯班是一名出生於德國的商人，經營幾家為第一次世界大战製造彈藥的工廠。為尋求擴大業務所需的政府合同與資金，他找到了英國國會議員兼商人弗雷德里克·亨德爾·布斯，布斯願意為他達成這兩個目標，並向格魯班徵求同意，以獲得一份高於原合同10%價格的新合同。同時隱瞞格魯班的公司董事會成員，欺騙格魯班將公司轉讓，並根據戰時條例將其以防止有人向自己索要賠償。 格魯班後來因自己被拘留一事獲法庭判決勝訴，并在獲釋之後將被告布斯帶到了法庭。該起案件非常受人關注，以至於參與訴訟的大律師因法庭外擠滿了大量的人群而導致每天很難進入法庭。儘管判決雙方的律師均得名於自己高超的辯護技巧，然而此案件的進展卻幾乎完全是以另外一種方式展開，陪審團僅僅只用了10分鐘的時間就認定布斯有罪。該起案件也使得受到關注，他因在此案件取得勝訴而成爲御用大律師。
dbp:name
Gruban v Booth
foaf:depiction
n13:David_Lloyd_George.jpg n13:German_trenches_churned_by_British_shells_LOC_22614894331.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:High_Court_of_Justice_cases dbc:1917_in_England dbc:English_criminal_case_law dbc:Fraud_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:Corruption_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:1917_in_British_law dbc:1917_in_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
22327131
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1094887359
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Board_of_Directors dbc:1917_in_England dbr:David_Lloyd_George dbr:Douglas_Hogg,_1st_Viscount_Hailsham dbr:Ministry_of_Munitions dbr:Minister_of_Munitions dbr:Queen's_Bench_Division_of_the_High_Court_of_Justice_of_England_and_Wales dbr:Internment dbr:Frederick_Handel_Booth dbc:English_criminal_case_law dbc:Fraud_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Habeas_corpus dbr:Christopher_Addison,_1st_Viscount_Addison dbr:Barristers dbr:Patrick_Hastings dbr:RMS_Lusitania dbr:Robert_Younger,_Baron_Blanesburgh dbc:Corruption_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:King's_Counsel dbc:1917_in_British_law dbr:John_Sankey,_1st_Viscount_Sankey dbc:1917_in_case_law n14:David_Lloyd_George.jpg dbr:High_Court_of_Justice dbr:Wastepaper_basket dbr:Rigby_Swift dbr:Marconi_scandal dbr:First_World_War dbr:Member_of_Parliament_(UK) dbr:Solicitor dbr:King's_Bench_Division dbr:Bernard_Coleridge,_2nd_Baron_Coleridge dbr:Jury_instructions dbr:Hubert_Wallington dbc:High_Court_of_Justice_cases dbr:Liberal_Party_(UK)
owl:sameAs
n10:4kc3C wikidata:Q5611861 dbpedia-zh:格鲁班诉布斯案 freebase:m.05t0cpj
dbp:subsequentActions
none
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:One_source dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Good_article dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Cite_book
dbo:thumbnail
n13:German_trenches_churned_by_British_shells_LOC_22614894331.jpg?width=300
dbp:court
dbr:Queen's_Bench_Division_of_the_High_Court_of_Justice_of_England_and_Wales
dbp:fullName
John Gruban v Frederick Handel Booth
dbp:judges
dbr:Bernard_Coleridge,_2nd_Baron_Coleridge
dbp:keywords
abuse of position Member of Parliament defrauding, deprivation of asset
dbo:abstract
格鲁班诉布斯案（英語：Gruban v Booth）是1917年在英國發生的一起欺詐案，由於被告人是一位英國國會議員，因此該起案件引起了很大關注。案件原告格魯班是一名出生於德國的商人，經營幾家為第一次世界大战製造彈藥的工廠。為尋求擴大業務所需的政府合同與資金，他找到了英國國會議員兼商人弗雷德里克·亨德爾·布斯，布斯願意為他達成這兩個目標，並向格魯班徵求同意，以獲得一份高於原合同10%價格的新合同。同時隱瞞格魯班的公司董事會成員，欺騙格魯班將公司轉讓，並根據戰時條例將其以防止有人向自己索要賠償。 格魯班後來因自己被拘留一事獲法庭判決勝訴，并在獲釋之後將被告布斯帶到了法庭。該起案件非常受人關注，以至於參與訴訟的大律師因法庭外擠滿了大量的人群而導致每天很難進入法庭。儘管判決雙方的律師均得名於自己高超的辯護技巧，然而此案件的進展卻幾乎完全是以另外一種方式展開，陪審團僅僅只用了10分鐘的時間就認定布斯有罪。該起案件也使得受到關注，他因在此案件取得勝訴而成爲御用大律師。 Gruban v Booth was a 1917 fraud case in England that generated significant publicity because the defendant, Frederick Handel Booth, was a Member of Parliament. Gruban was a German-born businessman who ran several factories that made tools for manufacturing munitions for the First World War. In an effort to find government contracts and money to expand his business, he contacted a businessman and MP, Frederick Handel Booth, who willingly promised both. Booth sought agreement from Gruban to have 10% of a large order's price, to be hidden from the rest of the Board; tricked Gruban into transferring the company, and had him interned under wartime regulations to prevent a claim against him. Gruban successfully appealed against his internment and as soon as he was freed brought Booth to court. The case was so popular that the involved barristers found it physically difficult to get into the court each day because of the size of the crowds gathered outside. Although those on both sides were noted for their skill, the case went almost entirely one way, with the jury taking only ten minutes to find Booth guilty. It was one of the first noted cases of Patrick Hastings, and his victory in it led to him applying to become a King's Counsel.
dbp:dateDecided
1917
dbp:decisionBy
Jury. In legal procedure and precedent directed by judge.
dbp:numberOfJudges
1
dbp:relatedActions
earlier habeas corpus appeal for release from internment as a probable or under-investigation national threat, won by claimant
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Gruban_v_Booth?oldid=1094887359&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
10714
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Gruban_v_Booth
Subject Item
dbr:John_Gruban
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Gruban_v_Booth
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Gruban_v_Booth