About: Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org:8891 associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org:8891/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FRelevant_and_irrelevant_considerations_in_Singapore_administrative_law

The failure of a public authority to take into account relevant considerations and the taking of irrelevant ones into account are grounds of in Singapore administrative law. They are regarded as forms of illegality.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law (en)
rdfs:comment	The failure of a public authority to take into account relevant considerations and the taking of irrelevant ones into account are grounds of in Singapore administrative law. They are regarded as forms of illegality. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Singaporean administrative law
Wikipage page ID	36971722 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1092534375 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Brenda Hale, Baroness Hale of Richmond Denbigh High School, Luton Home Secretary V. K. Rajah International waters Town and country planning in the United Kingdom Constitution of Singapore Court of Appeal of Singapore Chief constable Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson, Baron Browne-Wilkinson Freedom of religion Gloucestershire County Council Government of Singapore Ministry of Finance (Singapore) Monetary Authority of Singapore Murder of James Bulger Ultra vires Simon Brown, Baron Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Singapore Singapore Customs Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 Tariff Administrative law in Singapore Singaporean administrative law Dissenting opinion Court of Appeal of England and Wales Re Fong Thin Choo Ealing London Borough Council European Court of Human Rights Oxford University Press PSA International Judicial functions of the House of Lords Legitimate expectation in Singapore law High Court of Singapore Islam in the United Kingdom J. C. Penney Jehovah's Witnesses Jilbāb Precedent fact errors in Singapore law At Her Majesty's pleasure Chan Sek Keong Johan Steyn, Baron Steyn Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Remedies in Singapore administrative law Donald Nicholls, Baron Nicholls of Birkenhead Article 15 of the Constitution of Singapore Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights Somerset County Council Fettering of discretion in Singapore administrative law Freedom of religion in Singapore Human Rights Act 1998 Illegality in Singapore administrative law Certiorari Minister of Civil Aviation Lennie Hoffmann, Baron Hoffmann Singapore Cruise Centre Territorial waters European Convention on Human Rights Divisional Court (England and Wales) Lord Justice of Appeal Obiter dictum Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Public Prosecutor Tom Bingham, Baron Bingham of Cornhill Wednesbury unreasonableness in Singapore law R (Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School Wednesbury unreasonableness in Singapore dbr:Lines_International_Holding_(S)_Pte._Ltd._v._Singapore_Tourist_Promotion_Board dbr:Judicial_review_in_Singapore
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://archive.org/details/textbookonadmini0000leyl
sameAs	Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Citation dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Administrative_law dbt:Law_of_Singapore dbt:Use_British_(Oxford)_English
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Aisholt_Common_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1187829.jpg?width=300
has abstract	The failure of a public authority to take into account relevant considerations and the taking of irrelevant ones into account are grounds of in Singapore administrative law. They are regarded as forms of illegality. If, in the exercise of its discretion on a public duty, an authority takes into account considerations which the courts consider not to be proper, then in the eyes of the law it has not exercised its discretion legally. On the other hand, considerations that are relevant to a public authority's decision are of two kinds: there are mandatory relevant considerations (that is, considerations that the statute empowering the authority expressly or impliedly identifies as those that must be taken into account), and discretionary relevant considerations (those which the authority may take into account if it regards them as appropriate). If a decision-maker has determined that a particular consideration is relevant to its decision, it is entitled to attribute to it whatever weight it thinks fit, and the courts will not interfere unless it has acted in a Wednesbury-unreasonable manner. This is consistent with the principle that the courts are generally only concerned with the legality of decisions and not their merits. In the United Kingdom, it has been suggested that if the court interprets a statute to impose a duty on a public authority, the resources available to the authority are irrelevant to deciding how the duty should be carried out. Conversely, if the court interprets a statute to confer a discretionary power on a public authority, then resources are a relevant consideration. Also, public authorities are not required to take into account people's fundamental rights arising under the Human Rights Act 1998 as relevant considerations before arriving at decisions. Their only responsibility is to ensure that the decision itself complies with the European Convention on Human Rights. At present, there are no Singapore cases on these issues. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Relevant_and_irrelevant_considerations_in_Singapore_administrative_law?oldid=1092534375&ns=0

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software