Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (BC), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 525 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court held that courts have a residual discretion to refuse to answer reference questions where there is insufficient legal content or where the court would be unable to provide a complete and accurate answer.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Renvoi relatif au Régime d'assistance publique du Canada (C.-B.) (fr)
- Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (BC) (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Le Renvoi relatif au Régime d'assistance publique du Canada (C.-B.) est un avis constitutionnel important rendu par la Cour suprême du Canada en 1991. La Cour a jugé que les tribunaux ont un pouvoir discrétionnaire résiduel de refuser de répondre aux questions de renvoi lorsque le contenu juridique est insuffisant ou lorsque le tribunal serait incapable de fournir une réponse complète et précise. (fr)
- Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (BC), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 525 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court held that courts have a residual discretion to refuse to answer reference questions where there is insufficient legal content or where the court would be unable to provide a complete and accurate answer. (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
sameAs
| |
Unanimous
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
docket
| |
citations
| |
has abstract
| - Le Renvoi relatif au Régime d'assistance publique du Canada (C.-B.) est un avis constitutionnel important rendu par la Cour suprême du Canada en 1991. La Cour a jugé que les tribunaux ont un pouvoir discrétionnaire résiduel de refuser de répondre aux questions de renvoi lorsque le contenu juridique est insuffisant ou lorsque le tribunal serait incapable de fournir une réponse complète et précise. (fr)
- Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (BC), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 525 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court held that courts have a residual discretion to refuse to answer reference questions where there is insufficient legal content or where the court would be unable to provide a complete and accurate answer. (en)
|
case-name
| - Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (en)
|
decided-date
| |
heard-date
| |
SCC
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |