This HTML5 document contains 93 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n11https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n22https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n15https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/532/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n20http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/
n7http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep532/usrep532557/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n19https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118428/united-states-v-hatter/
n25https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/203/795/474774/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n18https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/532/557/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n16https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:United_States_v._Hatter
rdf:type
owl:Thing yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Case107308889 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:Case yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:LegalCase yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
United States v. Hatter
rdfs:comment
United States v. Hatter, 532 U.S. 557 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned an alleged violation of the Compensation Clause of the United States Constitution when Congress extended Medicare and Social Security taxes to federal judge salaries. Additionally, the case dealt with whether a later increase of federal judge salaries, greater than the new taxes, remedied the potential violation.
foaf:name
United States, Petitioner v. Terry J. Hatter, Judge of the District Court for the Central District of California, et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_that_overrule_a_prior_Supreme_Court_decision dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law dbc:Compensation_Clause_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:2001_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
34211784
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1017083747
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:Compensation_Clause_case_law dbr:F.3d dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbc:2001_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Medicare_(United_States) dbr:Fed._Cir. dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_that_overrule_a_prior_Supreme_Court_decision dbr:Columbia_Law_Review dbr:Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Evans_v._Gore dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:Sandra_Day_O'Connor dbr:Social_Security_(United_States) dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Majority_opinion dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:Court_of_Federal_Claims dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Writ_of_certiorari dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7:usrep532557.pdf n11:scholar_case%3Fcase=13977982647625958161 n19: n16:99-1978 n18: n15:557.html n25:
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0hzq6z3 wikidata:Q7893315 n22:4w98K yago-res:United_States_v._Hatter
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:USArticleIII dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:Refend dbt:Refbegin dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:joinmajority
Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg
dbp:oyez
n16:99-1978
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
557
dbp:usvol
532
dbp:arguedate
0001-02-20
dbp:argueyear
2001
dbp:case
United States v. Hatter,
dbp:courtlistener
n19:
dbp:decidedate
0001-05-21
dbp:decideyear
2001
dbp:findlaw
n15:557.html
dbp:fullname
United States, Petitioner v. Terry J. Hatter, Judge of the District Court for the Central District of California, et al.
dbp:holding
The Compensation Clause bars the government from collecting Social Security taxes from federal judges who held office before Congress extended those taxes; Medicare taxes can be collected.
dbp:justia
n18:
dbp:litigants
United States v. Hatter
dbp:majority
Breyer
dbp:loc
n7:usrep532557.pdf
dbo:abstract
United States v. Hatter, 532 U.S. 557 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned an alleged violation of the Compensation Clause of the United States Constitution when Congress extended Medicare and Social Security taxes to federal judge salaries. Additionally, the case dealt with whether a later increase of federal judge salaries, greater than the new taxes, remedied the potential violation.
n20:dissent
Thomas Scalia
dbp:googlescholar
n11:scholar_case%3Fcase=13977982647625958161
dbp:notparticipating
Stevens and O'Connor
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Hatter?oldid=1017083747&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
7528
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Hatter