This HTML5 document contains 107 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n8https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
n26http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/
n19https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n25https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/392/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n20http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep392/usrep392409/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n18https://web.archive.org/web/20150107063310/http:/columbialawreview.org/thirteenth-amendment-optimism/
n15https://www.courtlistener.com/scotus/y2J/jones-v-alfred-h-mayer-co/
n27https://web.archive.org/web/20151117023919/http:/columbialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n16http://columbialawreview.org/thirteenth-amendment-optimism/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
n17http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/392/409/
n24http://supreme.vlex.com/vid/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Jones_v._Alfred_H._Mayer_Co.
rdf:type
owl:Thing yago:Case107308889 wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:Case yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Event100029378 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:LegalCase yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
rdfs:label
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
rdfs:comment
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case, which held that Congress could regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial discrimination: "[42 U.S.C. § 1982] bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property, and that the statute, thus construed, is a valid exercise of the power of Congress to enforce the Thirteenth Amendment." The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (passed by Congress over the veto of Andrew Johnson) provided the basis for this decision as embodied by 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
foaf:name
Joseph Lee Jones et ux. v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Implied_statutory_cause_of_action_case_law dbc:United_States_Thirteenth_Amendment_case_law dbc:African-American_history_of_Missouri dbc:United_States_racial_discrimination_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbc:Civil_rights_movement_case_law dbc:1968_in_United_States_case_law dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation
dbo:wikiPageID
3222343
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1118835797
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:Implied_statutory_cause_of_action_case_law dbc:African-American_history_of_Missouri dbc:United_States_Thirteenth_Amendment_case_law dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:United_States_racial_discrimination_case_law dbr:Andrew_Johnson dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Columbia_Law_School dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Columbia_Law_Review dbr:Hodges_v._United_States dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1866 dbr:Certiorari dbr:Civil_Rights_Cases dbc:Civil_rights_movement_case_law dbr:CCH_(company) dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbc:1968_in_United_States_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_392
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n16: n17: n18: n20:usrep392409.pdf n15: n25:409 n24:jones-v-alfred-mayer-19991285 n19:1967_645 n26:getcase.pl%3Fnavby=CASE&court=US&vol=392&page=409 n27:1733-1768.pdf
owl:sameAs
n8:4pBpU yago-res:Jones_v._Alfred_H._Mayer_Co. freebase:m.08_ddj wikidata:Q6275330
dbp:vlex
n24:jones-v-alfred-mayer-19991285
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:UnitedStatesCode dbt:Note dbt:Wikisource dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ref dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Civil_rights_movement dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_journal
dbp:dissent
Harlan
dbp:joindissent
White
dbp:joinmajority
Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Fortas, Marshall
dbp:oyez
n19:1967_645
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
dbp:uspage
409
dbp:usvol
392
dbp:argueyear
1968
dbp:case
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.,
dbp:courtlistener
n15:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-17
dbp:decideyear
1968
dbp:findlaw
n26:getcase.pl%3Fnavby=CASE&court=US&vol=392&page=409
dbp:fullname
Joseph Lee Jones et ux. v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. et al.
dbp:holding
The Thirteenth Amendment allows Congress to regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial discrimination, as such racial discrimination is a badge of slavery.
dbp:justia
n17:
dbp:litigants
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
dbp:majority
Stewart
dbp:loc
n20:usrep392409.pdf
dbo:abstract
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case, which held that Congress could regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial discrimination: "[42 U.S.C. § 1982] bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property, and that the statute, thus construed, is a valid exercise of the power of Congress to enforce the Thirteenth Amendment." The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (passed by Congress over the veto of Andrew Johnson) provided the basis for this decision as embodied by 42 U.S.C. § 1982. Reversing many precedents, the Supreme Court held that the Civil Rights Act of 1866 prohibited both private and state-backed discrimination and that the 13th Amendment authorized Congress to prohibit private acts of discrimination as among "the badges and incidents of slavery." Congress possessed the power to "determine what are the badges and incidents of slavery, and the authority to translate that determination into effective legislation."
dbp:arguedatea
0001-04-01
dbp:arguedateb
2
dbp:concurrence
Douglas
dbp:cornell
n25:409
dbp:overturnedPreviousCase
Hodges v. United States, 203 U.S. 1 , & Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Jones_v._Alfred_H._Mayer_Co.?oldid=1118835797&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
5927
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Jones_v._Alfred_H._Mayer_Co.