This HTML5 document contains 92 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n21https://scholar.google.com/
n24https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/46/541/1555166/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n11http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n18https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n9https://supreme.justia.com/us/323/386/
n23http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep323/usrep323386/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n5https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/104055/hartford-empire-co-v-united-states/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/
n7http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n22http://dbpedia.org/property/joinconcurrence/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Hartford-Empire_Co._v._United_States
rdf:type
dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase wikidata:Q2334719 owl:Thing
rdfs:label
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States
rdfs:comment
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386 (1945), was a patent-antitrust case that the Government brought against a cartel in the glass container industry. The cartel, among other things, divided the fields of manufacture of glass containers, first, into blown glass (allocated to Corning Glass Works) and pressed glass, which was subdivided into: products made under the suction process (allocated to Owens-Illinois Glass Co.), milk bottles (allocated to Thatcher Mfg. Co.), and fruit jars (allocated to Ball Bros. plus a fixed production quota for Owens-Illinois, and Hazel-Atlas Co.). The trial court found the cartel violative of the antitrust laws and the Supreme Court agreed that the market division and related conduct were illegal. The trial court required royalty-free licensing of
foaf:name
Hartford-Empire Company v. United States
foaf:depiction
n7:HugoLaFayetteBlack.jpg n7:Owen_J._Roberts_cph.3b11988.jpg n7:Peiler_gob_feeder.jpg n7:Wiley_Rutledge.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Stone_Court dbc:1945_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
52301150
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1026752596
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Felix_Frankfurter dbr:United_States_v._Glaxo_Group_Ltd. dbr:Patent_misuse dbr:Frank_Murphy dbr:Wiley_Rutledge dbr:L._Ed. dbr:Besser_Mfg._Co._v._United_States n11:Owen_J._Roberts_cph.3b11988.jpg dbr:U.S.P.Q. dbr:Owen_Roberts dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Stanley_Forman_Reed dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbr:United_States_v._United_States_Gypsum_Co. n11:Wiley_Rutledge.jpg dbr:N.D._Ohio dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbr:William_O._Douglas dbr:Robert_H._Jackson dbr:Harlan_Stone n11:HugoLaFayetteBlack.jpg dbr:Hugo_Black dbr:F._Supp. dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1945_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Stone_Court n11:Peiler_gob_feeder.jpg
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n5: n21:scholar_case%3Fcase=4921128108776613924 n23:usrep323386.pdf n9:case.html n24:
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q28456258 n18:2eU7n yago-res:Hartford-Empire_Co._v._United_States
dbp:subsequent
Petition for clarification granted, .
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:BBstyle
dbo:thumbnail
n7:Peiler_gob_feeder.jpg?width=300
dbp:joinmajority
Stone, Reed, Frankfurter
dbp:parallelcitations
65
dbp:prior
46
dbp:uspage
386
dbp:usvol
323
dbp:argueyear
1943
dbp:case
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States,
dbp:courtlistener
n5:
dbp:decidedate
0001-01-08
dbp:decideyear
1945
dbp:fullname
Hartford-Empire Company v. United States
dbp:justia
n9:case.html
dbp:litigants
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States
dbp:majority
Roberts
dbp:loc
n23:usrep323386.pdf
dbo:abstract
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386 (1945), was a patent-antitrust case that the Government brought against a cartel in the glass container industry. The cartel, among other things, divided the fields of manufacture of glass containers, first, into blown glass (allocated to Corning Glass Works) and pressed glass, which was subdivided into: products made under the suction process (allocated to Owens-Illinois Glass Co.), milk bottles (allocated to Thatcher Mfg. Co.), and fruit jars (allocated to Ball Bros. plus a fixed production quota for Owens-Illinois, and Hazel-Atlas Co.). The trial court found the cartel violative of the antitrust laws and the Supreme Court agreed that the market division and related conduct were illegal. The trial court required royalty-free licensing of present patents and reasonable royalty licensing of future patents. A divided Supreme Court reversed the requirement for royalty-free licensing as "confiscatory," but sustained the requirement for reasonable royalty licensing of the patents.
dbp:arguedatea
0001-11-15
dbp:arguedateb
18
n8:dissent
Black Rutledge
dbp:googlescholar
n21:scholar_case%3Fcase=4921128108776613924
n22:dissent
Black
dbp:notparticipating
Douglas, Murphy, and Jackson
dbp:rearguedatea
0001-10-09
dbp:rearguedateb
10
dbp:reargueyear
1944
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Hartford-Empire_Co._v._United_States?oldid=1026752596&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
63419
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Hartford-Empire_Co._v._United_States