This HTML5 document contains 82 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n18https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/590/1361/2246997/
n10http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep480/usrep480572/
n20https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/480/
n14https://www.oyez.org/cases/1986/
n11https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n15https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/480/572/
n19http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n17https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/768/1077/407940/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
n9http://dbpedia.org/property/joinconcurrence/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:California_Coastal_Comm'n_v._Granite_Rock_Co.
rdf:type
dbo:UnitOfWork owl:Thing wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:LegalCase dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:Case
rdfs:label
California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co.
rdfs:comment
California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co., 480 U.S. 572 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case addressing the question of whether United States Forest Service regulations, federal land use statutes and regulations, or the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, preempt the California Coastal Commission's imposition of a permit requirement on operation of an unpatented mining claim in a national forest. The court ruled that even if federal land is not included in the Coastal Zone Management Act's interpretation of "coastal zone," the act does not automatically preempt all state regulation of activities on federal lands.
foaf:name
California Coastal Commissionv.Granite Rock Co.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Limestone_industry dbc:Big_Sur dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1987_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
51355424
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1063367686
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:Limestone_industry dbr:United_States_Forest_Service dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:F.2d dbr:Los_Padres_National_Forest dbc:1987_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Big_Sur dbr:Watsonville,_California dbr:Article_Four_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:California_Coastal_Commission dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:N.D._Cal. dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:9th_Cir. dbr:F._Supp. dbr:Rocky_Mountains dbr:Big_Sur dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Coastal_Zone_Management_Act dbr:Graniterock
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n10:usrep480572.pdf n14:85-1200 n15:case.html n17: n18: n20:572.html
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q28402464 n11:2dnAB yago-res:California_Coastal_Comm'n_v._Granite_Rock_Co.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Big_Sur dbt:Convert dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Caselaw_source
dbp:dissent
Scalia
dbp:joindissent
White
dbp:joinmajority
Rehnquist, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, and Stevens
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Article_Four_of_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oyez
n14:85-1200
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
572
dbp:usvol
480
dbp:arguedate
0001-12-02
dbp:argueyear
1986
dbp:case
California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co.,
dbp:decidedate
0001-03-24
dbp:decideyear
1987
dbp:findlaw
n20:572.html
dbp:fullname
California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co.
dbp:holding
A state may require an unpatented mining claim in a national forest within the coastal zone to be reviewed by the state's coastal agency.
dbp:justia
n15:case.html
dbp:litigants
California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co.
dbp:majority
O'Connor
dbp:loc
n10:usrep480572.pdf
dbo:abstract
California Coastal Comm'n v. Granite Rock Co., 480 U.S. 572 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case addressing the question of whether United States Forest Service regulations, federal land use statutes and regulations, or the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, preempt the California Coastal Commission's imposition of a permit requirement on operation of an unpatented mining claim in a national forest. The court ruled that even if federal land is not included in the Coastal Zone Management Act's interpretation of "coastal zone," the act does not automatically preempt all state regulation of activities on federal lands.
n19:dissent
Powell
n9:dissent
Stevens
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:California_Coastal_Comm'n_v._Granite_Rock_Co.?oldid=1063367686&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
9489
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:California_Coastal_Comm'n_v._Granite_Rock_Co.