This HTML5 document contains 83 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n10http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Cybersell,_Inc._v._Cybersell,_Inc.
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King
Subject Item
dbr:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King
rdf:type
yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Abstraction100002137
rdfs:label
Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King
rdfs:comment
Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 126 F.3d 25, is a 1997 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case that helped define the parameters of personal jurisdiction in the Internet context, specifically for passive websites that only advertise local services. The opinion, written by Judge Ellsworth Van Graafeiland, affirmed the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York's holding that defendant Richard B. King's Internet website did not satisfy New York's long-arm statute requirements for plaintiff Bensusan Restaurant Corporation to bring a trademark infringement suit in New York. The District Court's decision also likened creating a website to merely placing a product into the stream of commerce, and held that such an act was insufficient to satisfy due
foaf:depiction
n10:Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:2007_in_United_States_case_law dbc:History_of_Columbia,_Missouri dbc:Jazz_clubs_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit_cases dbc:United_States_Internet_case_law dbc:United_States_lawsuits dbc:United_States_trademark_case_law dbc:United_States_personal_jurisdiction_case_law dbc:20th_century_in_Columbia,_Missouri
dbo:wikiPageID
30774143
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1088197328
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbc:2007_in_United_States_case_law dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:Pierre_N._Leval dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York dbr:The_Blue_Note_(Columbia,_Missouri) dbc:History_of_Columbia,_Missouri dbr:Federal_Rules_of_Civil_Procedure dbr:Cybersell,_Inc._v._Cybersell,_Inc. dbr:Personal_jurisdiction dbc:Jazz_clubs_in_the_United_States dbr:Ellsworth_Van_Graafeiland dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit_cases dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:John_M._Walker,_Jr. dbr:Columbia,_Missouri dbr:Western_District_of_Pennsylvania dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Arizona dbc:United_States_Internet_case_law dbc:United_States_trademark_case_law dbc:United_States_lawsuits dbr:Zippo_Manufacturing_Co._v._Zippo_Dot_Com,_Inc. dbc:United_States_personal_jurisdiction_case_law dbc:20th_century_in_Columbia,_Missouri dbr:New_York_Civil_Practice_Law_and_Rules
owl:sameAs
yago-res:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King n16:4XthR wikidata:Q4890302 freebase:m.0gg6tv3
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_COA_case dbt:Law dbt:Quote_box dbt:Short_description
dbo:thumbnail
n10:Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit.svg?width=300
dbp:prior
Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 937 F. Supp. 295
dbp:align
left
dbp:arguedate
1997-04-09
dbp:bgcolor
#F9F9F9
dbp:border
0.8
dbp:citations
25920.0
dbp:court
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit
dbp:courtseal
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.svg
dbp:decidedate
Sept. 10, 1997
dbp:fontsize
75
dbp:fullname
Bensusan Restaurant Corporation v. Richard B. King, individually and doing business as The Blue Note
dbp:holding
In favor of defendant Richard B. King
dbp:judges
dbr:Pierre_N._Leval dbr:Ellsworth_Van_Graafeiland dbr:John_M._Walker,_Jr.
dbp:litigants
Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King
dbp:quote
Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries. Acts which are the basis of jurisdiction. As to a cause of action arising from any of the acts enumerated in this section, a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over any non-domiciliary, or his executor or administrator, who in person or through an agent: . . . 2. commits a tortious act within the state, except as to a cause of action for defamation of character arising from the act; or 3. commits a tortious act without the state causing injury to person or property within the state, except as to a cause of action for defamation of character arising from the act, if he . . . expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce.
dbp:source
N.Y. C.P.L.R. ยง 302
dbo:abstract
Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 126 F.3d 25, is a 1997 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case that helped define the parameters of personal jurisdiction in the Internet context, specifically for passive websites that only advertise local services. The opinion, written by Judge Ellsworth Van Graafeiland, affirmed the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York's holding that defendant Richard B. King's Internet website did not satisfy New York's long-arm statute requirements for plaintiff Bensusan Restaurant Corporation to bring a trademark infringement suit in New York. The District Court's decision also likened creating a website to merely placing a product into the stream of commerce, and held that such an act was insufficient to satisfy due process and personal jurisdiction requirements.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King?oldid=1088197328&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
10997
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King
Subject Item
dbr:The_Blue_Note_(Columbia,_Missouri)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King
Subject Item
dbr:Personal_jurisdiction_in_Internet_cases_in_the_United_States
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King
Subject Item
dbr:Bensusan_Restaurant_v._King
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Bensusan_Restaurant_Corp._v._King