This HTML5 document contains 33 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n18https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Intentional_tort
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Substantial_certainty_doctrine
Subject Item
dbr:Substantial_certainty_doctrine
rdf:type
yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciples yago:Content105809192 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Belief105941423 yago:Doctrine105943300
rdfs:label
Substantial certainty doctrine
rdfs:comment
In law, the substantial certainty doctrine is the assumption of intent even if the actor did not intend the result, but knew with substantial certainty the effect would occur as a result of his action. The doctrine can be used by courts as a test to determine whether or not a defendant committed a tort. For example, in Garratt v. Dailey (1955), the Washington Supreme Court remanded a case back to the lower courts to determine whether or not the five year-old defendant "knew with substantial certainty that the plaintiff would attempt to sit down where the chair which he moved had been."
dcterms:subject
dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles
dbo:wikiPageID
14163800
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
974959187
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Garratt_v._Dailey dbr:Law dbr:Washington_Supreme_Court dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbr:Tort
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.03cwk35 wikidata:Q7632071 yago-res:Substantial_certainty_doctrine n18:4vvFB
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Law-term-stub
dbo:abstract
In law, the substantial certainty doctrine is the assumption of intent even if the actor did not intend the result, but knew with substantial certainty the effect would occur as a result of his action. The doctrine can be used by courts as a test to determine whether or not a defendant committed a tort. For example, in Garratt v. Dailey (1955), the Washington Supreme Court remanded a case back to the lower courts to determine whether or not the five year-old defendant "knew with substantial certainty that the plaintiff would attempt to sit down where the chair which he moved had been."
gold:hypernym
dbr:Assumption
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Substantial_certainty_doctrine?oldid=974959187&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
1044
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Substantial_certainty_doctrine
Subject Item
dbr:Trespass_to_chattels
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Substantial_certainty_doctrine
Subject Item
dbr:Garratt_v._Dailey
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Substantial_certainty_doctrine
Subject Item
dbr:Substantial_Certainty_Doctrine
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Substantial_certainty_doctrine
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Substantial_certainty_doctrine
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Substantial_certainty_doctrine
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Substantial_certainty_doctrine