This HTML5 document contains 40 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:RLUIPA_Equal_Terms_Provision_Circuit_Split
rdfs:label
RLUIPA Equal Terms Provision Circuit Split
rdfs:comment
President Bill Clinton signed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 into law on September 22 of 2000. This piece of legislation was intended to protect the free exercise of religion as it relates to institutionalized persons and land use. One provision of RLUIPA pertaining to land use is the Equal Terms Provision. The Equal Terms Provision states "No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution." While RLUIPA has been the subject of much scholarly writing, the Equal Terms Provision has received little attention on its own.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_case_law dbc:Law_about_religion_in_the_United_States
dbo:wikiPageID
34634090
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
987244724
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Institution dbr:Government dbr:Bill_Clinton dbc:United_States_case_law dbr:Local_government dbr:Religion dbr:President_of_the_United_States dbr:Court dbr:Municipality dbr:Synagogue dbr:Test_(assessment) dbr:Judiciary_Act_of_1891 dbr:Secularity dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eleventh_Circuit dbr:Academic_writing dbr:Religious_Land_Use_and_Institutionalized_Persons_Act_of_2000 dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:Land_use dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Third_Circuit dbr:Circuit_split dbr:Legislation dbc:Law_about_religion_in_the_United_States dbr:Strict_scrutiny
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q7276956 freebase:m.0j3cz4l n15:4tZME
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist
dbo:abstract
President Bill Clinton signed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 into law on September 22 of 2000. This piece of legislation was intended to protect the free exercise of religion as it relates to institutionalized persons and land use. One provision of RLUIPA pertaining to land use is the Equal Terms Provision. The Equal Terms Provision states "No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution." While RLUIPA has been the subject of much scholarly writing, the Equal Terms Provision has received little attention on its own. However, the Equal Terms Provision has proven difficult for some courts to interpret and has caused a circuit split as to its application. At this point in time there are three different approaches that Circuit Courts of Appeals have applied to the Equal Terms Provision.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:RLUIPA_Equal_Terms_Provision_Circuit_Split?oldid=987244724&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
5558
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:RLUIPA_Equal_Terms_Provision_Circuit_Split
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:RLUIPA_Equal_Terms_Provision_Circuit_Split
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:RLUIPA_Equal_Terms_Provision_Circuit_Split