HTML Microdata document

This HTML5 document contains 80 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

Prefix	IRI
dcterms	http://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbo	http://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foaf	http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n11	https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbt	http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfs	http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdf	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owl	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-en	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbpedia-zh	http://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbp	http://dbpedia.org/property/
dbc	http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
prov	http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdh	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
gold	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidata	http://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbr	http://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item: dbr:Prince_Johnson
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Santosky_v._Kramer
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Procedural_due_process
rdf:type: owl:Thing dbo:MilitaryUnit
rdfs:label: 程序性正当程序 Procedural due process
rdfs:comment: Procedural due process is a legal doctrine in the United States that requires government officials to follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property. When the government seeks to deprive a person of one of those interests, procedural due process requires at least for the government to afford the person notice, an opportunity to be heard, and a decision made by a neutral decisionmaker. Procedural due process is required by the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 程序性正当程序是美国的一个法律原则，要求政府官员在剥夺个人的生命、自由或财产之前遵循公平程序。当政府试图剥夺个人的其中一项利益时，程序性正当程序至少要求政府向（权利）被剥夺方发出通知，提供听证机会，以及需由中立判决者作出裁决。《美国宪法》第五修正案和第十四修正案的正当程序条款要求实施程序正当程序。法官撰写的《某种听证》一文列出了诸项基本正当程序权利，“在内容和相对优先权方面仍然具有很高的影响力”。同等适用于民事诉讼和刑事诉讼程序的权利如下： 1. * 公正的法庭 2. * 关于拟议行动及其所主张理由的告之。 3. * 提出不采取拟议行动的理由的机会。 4. * 提供证据的权利，包括传召证人的权利。 5. * 获知对己方不利证据的权利。 6. * 盘问对己方不利的证人的权利。 7. * 仅基于所提供证据而判决。 8. * 律师代表的机会。 9. * 法庭准备一份所提交证据的记录。 10. * 法庭应准备书面的事实调查结果和作出判决的理由当政府试图剥夺一个人的生命、自由或财产时，并非所有上述权利都得到保证。一个人得到通知，有机会得到听证，并由中立的判决方作出裁决时才算得到正当性程序保护。法院使用各种各样的测试来确定一个人是否也应该获得除上述任何其他程序性权利外的（权利）保障。
owl:differentFrom: dbr:Substantive_due_process
dcterms:subject: dbc:American_legal_terminology dbc:United_States_civil_due_process_case_law dbc:Due_Process_Clause dbc:United_States_criminal_due_process_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID: 646835
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID: 1097429090
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbc:United_States_civil_due_process_case_law dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:American_legal_terminology dbr:United_States dbr:Henry_Friendly dbc:Due_Process_Clause dbr:Life dbr:Legal_doctrine dbr:Property dbc:United_States_criminal_due_process_case_law dbr:US_Constitution dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbr:Liberty dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
owl:sameAs: dbpedia-zh:程序性正当程序 n11:zRb5 wikidata:Q21070971
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate: dbt:Law-stub dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:Distinguish
dbo:abstract: 程序性正当程序是美国的一个法律原则，要求政府官员在剥夺个人的生命、自由或财产之前遵循公平程序。当政府试图剥夺个人的其中一项利益时，程序性正当程序至少要求政府向（权利）被剥夺方发出通知，提供听证机会，以及需由中立判决者作出裁决。《美国宪法》第五修正案和第十四修正案的正当程序条款要求实施程序正当程序。法官撰写的《某种听证》一文列出了诸项基本正当程序权利，“在内容和相对优先权方面仍然具有很高的影响力”。同等适用于民事诉讼和刑事诉讼程序的权利如下： 1. * 公正的法庭 2. * 关于拟议行动及其所主张理由的告之。 3. * 提出不采取拟议行动的理由的机会。 4. * 提供证据的权利，包括传召证人的权利。 5. * 获知对己方不利证据的权利。 6. * 盘问对己方不利的证人的权利。 7. * 仅基于所提供证据而判决。 8. * 律师代表的机会。 9. * 法庭准备一份所提交证据的记录。 10. * 法庭应准备书面的事实调查结果和作出判决的理由当政府试图剥夺一个人的生命、自由或财产时，并非所有上述权利都得到保证。一个人得到通知，有机会得到听证，并由中立的判决方作出裁决时才算得到正当性程序保护。法院使用各种各样的测试来确定一个人是否也应该获得除上述任何其他程序性权利外的（权利）保障。 Procedural due process is a legal doctrine in the United States that requires government officials to follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property. When the government seeks to deprive a person of one of those interests, procedural due process requires at least for the government to afford the person notice, an opportunity to be heard, and a decision made by a neutral decisionmaker. Procedural due process is required by the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The article "Some Kind of Hearing" written by Judge Henry Friendly created a list of basic due process rights "that remains highly influential, as to both content and relative priority." The rights, which apply equally to civil due process and criminal due process, are the following: 1. * An unbiased tribunal. 2. * Notice of the proposed action and the grounds asserted for it. 3. * The opportunity to present reasons for the proposed action not to be taken. 4. * The right to present evidence, including the right to call witnesses. 5. * The right to know the opposing evidence. 6. * The right to cross-examine adverse witnesses. 7. * A decision based only on the evidence presented. 8. * Opportunity to be represented by counsel. 9. * A requirement that the tribunal prepare a record of the evidence presented. 10. * A requirement that the tribunal prepare written findings of fact and the reasons for its decision. Not all the above rights are guaranteed in every instance when the government seeks to deprive a person life, liberty, or property. At minimum, a person is due only notice, an opportunity to be heard, and a decision by a neutral decisionmaker. Courts use various tests to determine whether a person should also be guaranteed any of the other above procedural rights.
gold:hypernym: dbr:Doctrine
prov:wasDerivedFrom: wikipedia-en:Procedural_due_process?oldid=1097429090&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength: 2811
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf: wikipedia-en:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Hughes_Court
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Johnson_v._Louisiana
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Joint_Anti-Fascist_Refugee_Committee_v._McGrath
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Robert_H._Jackson
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Due_Process_Clause
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Due_process
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Intermediate_scrutiny
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Washington_v._Trump
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Ryan_Shapiro
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Truth_and_Reconciliation_Commission_(Liberia)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Ellen_Johnson_Sirleaf
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Fuentes_v._Shevin
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Constitutionality_of_sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Legal_challenges_to_the_Trump_travel_ban
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Logan_v._Zimmerman_Brush_Co.
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Skinner_v._Oklahoma
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Massachusetts_Body_of_Liberties
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Trump_v._Hawaii
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Lakeside_v._Oregon
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Abel_Briones_Ruiz
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Executive_Order_13780
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Kerry_v._Din
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:LeVake_v._Independent_School_District_656
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:United_States_National_Sex_Offenders_Public_Registry
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Idalia_Ramos_Rangel
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Immigration_Act_of_1891
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Michael_H._v._Gerald_D.
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Ong_Ah_Chuan_v_Public_Prosecutor
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Carter_v._Kentucky
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Substantive_due_process
owl:differentFrom: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Terrorist_Screening_Database
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Palestinian_law
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Palm_Sunday_Compromise
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Subpoena_ad_testificandum
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: dbr:Rational_basis_review
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink: dbr:Procedural_due_process

Subject Item: wikipedia-en:Procedural_due_process
foaf:primaryTopic: dbr:Procedural_due_process