This HTML5 document contains 66 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Homer_to_the_Max
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
Subject Item
dbr:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
rdf:type
yago:WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases yago:Case107308889 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Event100029378 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Happening107283608
rdfs:label
Lundberg v. County of Humboldt
rdfs:comment
Lundberg v. County of Humboldt was a United States District Court for the Northern District of California decision issued on April 29, 2005, which arose out of a protest dispute in 1997 between environmental activists for the Headwaters Forest and the Sheriff's Deputies of Humboldt County, California. During three protests in the Fall of 1997, police officers tortured activists by swabbing pepper spray in the eyes of eight activists practicing nonviolent resistance. The action taken by the police was later unanimously ruled to be excessive force and a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_District_Court_case_articles_without_infoboxes dbc:Pacific_Lumber_Company dbc:Police_brutality_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:Law_enforcement_in_California dbc:2005_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Humboldt_County,_California dbc:Environmentalism_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
34001878
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1119929302
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Pepper_spray dbc:United_States_District_Court_case_articles_without_infoboxes dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbc:Police_brutality_in_the_United_States dbr:California dbr:Pacific_Lumber_Company dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbr:Humboldt_County,_California dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:Law_enforcement_in_California dbc:Pacific_Lumber_Company dbr:Homer_Simpson dbc:2005_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Marge_Simpson dbr:Police_brutality dbr:Nonviolent_resistance dbr:Eureka,_California dbc:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California_cases dbc:Environmentalism_in_the_United_States dbr:Ed_Begley_Jr. dbr:Homer_to_the_Max dbr:Susan_Illston dbr:Vaughn_Walker dbr:Cotton_swab dbr:The_Simpsons dbr:Frank_Riggs dbr:Scotia dbc:Humboldt_County,_California dbr:Headwaters_Forest_Reserve
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0hrg_kd wikidata:Q6704107 n16:4qtuK yago-res:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist
dbo:abstract
Lundberg v. County of Humboldt was a United States District Court for the Northern District of California decision issued on April 29, 2005, which arose out of a protest dispute in 1997 between environmental activists for the Headwaters Forest and the Sheriff's Deputies of Humboldt County, California. During three protests in the Fall of 1997, police officers tortured activists by swabbing pepper spray in the eyes of eight activists practicing nonviolent resistance. The action taken by the police was later unanimously ruled to be excessive force and a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The jurors in the trial were clearly shaken after watching a video of the victims sitting helplessly while police pulled their heads back by the hair and dabbed the chemical in their eyes over their screams, and the plaintiffs, who had experienced it and then had to watch it in the two preceding trials, had to suffer through it once more. Some of the victims were not even 18 years old. The video demonstrated the claims of the plaintiffs that police were inflicting punishment on them while they were clearly engaged in peaceful protest and were not a threat to anyone. An expert witness testified at the trial that the incident represented a "classic case of police brutality" and "grotesque abuse". One of the plaintiffs described that one of the clear messages from the trial was about "police brutality and torture and what's acceptable behavior of one human being to another." On May 6, 2017, William Honsal, one of the defendants named in the lawsuit, became interim Sheriff of Humboldt County after being appointed by the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors. Honsal was reelected in 2018 and in 2022, both times unopposed without any other candidates on the ballot.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt?oldid=1119929302&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
7532
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
Subject Item
dbr:Headwaters_Forest_Defense_v._County_of_Humboldt
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
Subject Item
dbr:Pepper_Spray_8
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt