This HTML5 document contains 35 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Independent_source_doctrine
rdf:type
yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Doctrine105943300 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Belief105941423 yago:Content105809192 yago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciples
rdfs:label
Independent source doctrine
rdfs:comment
In US law, the independent source doctrine is an exception to the exclusionary rule. The doctrine applies to evidence initially discovered during, or as a consequence of, an unlawful search, but later obtained independently from activities untainted by the initial illegality. The United States Supreme Court, in Nix v. Williams, provided the policy rationale for admitting tainted evidence:
dct:subject
dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:American_legal_terminology
dbo:wikiPageID
42231873
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
741149679
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:American_legal_terminology dbr:Nix_v._Williams dbr:Exclusionary_rule dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:Murray_v._United_States
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0100npd1 n16:c3XR wikidata:Q16147736 yago-res:Independent_source_doctrine
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Criminal_procedure
dbo:abstract
In US law, the independent source doctrine is an exception to the exclusionary rule. The doctrine applies to evidence initially discovered during, or as a consequence of, an unlawful search, but later obtained independently from activities untainted by the initial illegality. The United States Supreme Court, in Nix v. Williams, provided the policy rationale for admitting tainted evidence: The independent source doctrine teaches us that the interest of society in deterring unlawful conduct and the public interest in having juries receive all probative evidence of a crime are properly balanced by putting the police in the same, not a worse, position that they would have been in if no police error or misconduct had occurred. The United States Supreme Court, in Murray v. United States provided the current independent source doctrine rule. The Murray court held that a state may not rely on the independent source doctrine if (1) the agents' decision to seek the warrant was prompted by what they had seen during the initial entry or (2) if information obtained during that entry was presented to the Magistrate and affected his decision to issue the warrant.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Exception
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Independent_source_doctrine?oldid=741149679&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
1988
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Independent_source_doctrine
Subject Item
dbr:Inevitable_discovery
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Independent_source_doctrine
Subject Item
dbr:Murray_v._United_States
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Independent_source_doctrine
Subject Item
dbr:Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Independent_source_doctrine
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Independent_source_doctrine
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Independent_source_doctrine