This HTML5 document contains 98 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n10https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n12https://supreme.justia.com/us/285/22/
n14http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep285/usrep285022/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n18https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/285/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_285
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
Subject Item
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Hughes_Court
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
Subject Item
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
rdf:type
owl:Thing yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:UnitOfWork yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:LegalCase umbel-rc:Event dbo:Case yago:Happening107283608 yago:Event100029378 yago:Abstraction100002137 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Case107308889
rdfs:label
Crowell v. Benson
rdfs:comment
Crowell v. Benson, 285 U.S. 22 (1932) is the landmark United States Supreme Court administrative law decision that outlined the adjudicatory authority of administrative agencies under Article III of the Constitution. The Court held that the United States Employees' Compensation Commission satisfied Fifth Amendment Due Process and the requirements of Article III with its court-like procedures and because it invests the final power of decision in Article III courts.
foaf:name
Crowell, Deputy Commissioner v. Benson
dct:subject
dbc:Employee_compensation_in_the_United_States dbc:1932_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_due_process_case_law dbc:United_States_administrative_case_law dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law dbc:Good_Behavior_Clause_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Hughes_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
19239012
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1070248818
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Due_process_of_law dbr:Courts_of_equity dbr:Trial_de_novo dbr:Findings_of_fact dbr:Admiralty_law dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:L._Ed. dbr:Employees'_Compensation_Commission dbc:1932_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_due_process_case_law dbc:United_States_administrative_case_law dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law dbc:Good_Behavior_Clause_case_law dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Common_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Hughes_Court dbr:Administrative_law dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_285 dbc:Employee_compensation_in_the_United_States dbr:Article_III_of_the_United_States_Constitution
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n18:22.html n12:case.html n14:usrep285022.pdf
owl:sameAs
yago-res:Crowell_v._Benson n10:4it3S freebase:m.04lgd0q wikidata:Q5189229
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Pn dbt:Ussc dbt:Reflist dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:USArticleIII dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:dissent
Brandeis
dbp:joindissent
Stone, Roberts
dbp:joinmajority
Holmes, Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, Butler
dbp:parallelcitations
52
dbp:uspage
22
dbp:usvol
285
dbp:argueyear
1931
dbp:case
Crowell v. Benson,
dbp:decidedate
0001-02-23
dbp:decideyear
1932
dbp:findlaw
n18:22.html
dbp:fullname
Crowell, Deputy Commissioner v. Benson
dbp:justia
n12:case.html
dbp:litigants
Crowell v. Benson
dbp:majority
Hughes
dbp:loc
n14:usrep285022.pdf
dbo:abstract
Crowell v. Benson, 285 U.S. 22 (1932) is the landmark United States Supreme Court administrative law decision that outlined the adjudicatory authority of administrative agencies under Article III of the Constitution. The Court held that the United States Employees' Compensation Commission satisfied Fifth Amendment Due Process and the requirements of Article III with its court-like procedures and because it invests the final power of decision in Article III courts.
dbp:arguedatea
0001-10-20
dbp:arguedateb
21
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Crowell_v._Benson?oldid=1070248818&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
7509
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Crowell_v._Benson
Subject Item
dbr:February_1932
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
Subject Item
dbr:Crowell_v_Benson
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
Subject Item
dbr:285_U.S._22
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
Subject Item
dbr:Northern_Pipeline_Construction_Co._v._Marathon_Pipe_Line_Co.
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
Subject Item
dbr:Benson
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Crowell_v._Benson
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Crowell_v._Benson