This HTML5 document contains 57 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n11https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n16http://www.worldlii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1942/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Bourhill_v_Young
rdf:type
yago:Event100029378 yago:Case107308889 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Happening107283608
rdfs:label
Bourhill v Young
rdfs:comment
Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 (also titled Hay v Young) is a Scottish delict case, on the subject of how extensive an individual's duty is to ensure others are not harmed by their activities. The case established important boundaries on the scope of recovery for bystanders, or those uninvolved with physical harm. Where a woman suffered psychiatric harm after walking onto the scene of a motorcycle accident, she was deemed not to be a foreseeable victim, having not been in immediate danger of physical harm.
dbp:name
Bourhill v Young
dcterms:subject
dbc:1942_in_Scotland dbc:House_of_Lords_cases dbc:1942_in_British_law dbc:1942_in_case_law dbc:Delict dbc:Scottish_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
23620548
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1074911348
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Scottish_delict_case dbc:1942_in_British_law dbc:1942_in_Scotland dbc:1942_in_case_law dbc:House_of_Lords_cases dbr:Duty_of_care dbr:Road_traffic_collision dbc:Delict dbr:Charles_Ritchie_Russell,_Baron_Russell_of_Killowen dbr:House_of_Lords dbr:Tram dbc:Scottish_case_law dbr:Stillbirth
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n16:5.html
owl:sameAs
n11:4ag4m wikidata:Q4950173 freebase:m.07s57ts
dbp:transcripts
n16:5.html
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cquote dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_Court_Case dbt:Use_British_English
dbp:citations
[1943] AC 92
dbp:court
dbr:House_of_Lords
dbp:keywords
Remoteness of damage
dbo:abstract
Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 (also titled Hay v Young) is a Scottish delict case, on the subject of how extensive an individual's duty is to ensure others are not harmed by their activities. The case established important boundaries on the scope of recovery for bystanders, or those uninvolved with physical harm. Where a woman suffered psychiatric harm after walking onto the scene of a motorcycle accident, she was deemed not to be a foreseeable victim, having not been in immediate danger of physical harm.
dbp:dateDecided
1942-08-05
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bourhill_v_Young?oldid=1074911348&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3374
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bourhill_v_Young
Subject Item
dbr:List_of_Scottish_legal_cases
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bourhill_v_Young
Subject Item
dbr:Remoteness_in_English_law
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bourhill_v_Young
Subject Item
dbr:Attia_v_British_Gas_plc
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bourhill_v_Young
Subject Item
dbr:Hay_v_Young
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bourhill_v_Young
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Bourhill_v_Young
Subject Item
dbr:Fishwife
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bourhill_v_Young
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Bourhill_v_Young
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Bourhill_v_Young