This HTML5 document contains 40 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n19http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n18https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n16http://viaf.org/viaf/
n11http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n15http://d-nb.info/gnd/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Conrad_Rudolph
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Apologia_ad_Guillelmum
Subject Item
dbr:Apologia_ad_Guillelmum
rdf:type
owl:Thing
rdfs:label
Apologia ad Guillelmum
rdfs:comment
Bernard of Clairvaux's Apologia ad Guillelmum was written in 1125 at the ostensible request of his friend and fellow monastic reformer, William of Saint-Thierry, and is the key document in the early twelfth century controversy over art, the greatest controversy over art to occur in the West previous to the Reformation. The Apologia is the most articulate document we have for this controversy and one of the most important in understanding how medieval art was used and perceived. In it, Bernard takes up five major criticisms of the use of monastic art.
foaf:depiction
n11:Master_Of_Saint_Gilles_-_The_Mass_of_St_Gilles_-_WGA14485.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Christian_art dbc:1125_works
dbo:wikiPageID
51453437
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1072724497
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Catholic_Church_art dbr:Bernard_of_Clairvaux dbr:William_of_St-Thierry dbc:Christian_art dbr:Premonstratensians dbr:Order_of_Saint_Benedict dbr:Carthusians dbc:1125_works dbr:Cistercians dbr:Cluny_Abbey dbr:Protestant_Reformation n19:Master_Of_Saint_Gilles_-_The_Mass_of_St_Gilles_-_WGA14485.jpg dbr:Early_Christianity dbr:Gilbertine_Order
owl:sameAs
yago-res:Apologia_ad_Guillelmum wikidata:Q28134525 n15:4477182-4 n16:218112859 n18:2ca2j n15:1125743727
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:More_citations_needed dbt:Reflist dbt:More_footnotes dbt:Authority_control dbt:Multiple_issues
dbo:thumbnail
n11:Master_Of_Saint_Gilles_-_The_Mass_of_St_Gilles_-_WGA14485.jpg?width=300
dbo:abstract
Bernard of Clairvaux's Apologia ad Guillelmum was written in 1125 at the ostensible request of his friend and fellow monastic reformer, William of Saint-Thierry, and is the key document in the early twelfth century controversy over art, the greatest controversy over art to occur in the West previous to the Reformation. Already in the Early Christian period, there was disagreement within the Church as to the appropriateness of religious art. While the use of religious art gradually came to be accepted by the mainstream, its rejection within certain limits remained a constant throughout the Middle Ages. In the twelfth century, certain elements within reform monasticism (especially the Cistercians but also others) saw the use of art by monks as inappropriate for a number of reasons. Criticism of the use of monastic art was seen as a criticism of the greatest patrons of religious art of the time, traditional Benedictine monasticism (virtually all of the greatest medieval art up until this time had been religious). Since traditional Benedictine monasticism was one of the richest and most influential segments of society—and since art was one of the great vehicles of interaction between traditional monasticism and the lay public, this interaction being an important source of wealth for monasticism—the controversy over art that arose involved far more than aesthetic questions. The Apologia is the most articulate document we have for this controversy and one of the most important in understanding how medieval art was used and perceived. In it, Bernard takes up five major criticisms of the use of monastic art.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Apologia_ad_Guillelmum?oldid=1072724497&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
6227
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Apologia_ad_Guillelmum
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Apologia_ad_Guillelmum
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Apologia_ad_Guillelmum