This HTML5 document contains 86 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n11https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/
n10https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n14https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n8https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/575/13-553/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n7https://www.leagle.com/decision/
n17http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/alabama-department-of-revenue-v-csx-transportation-inc/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.
rdf:type
dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:LegalCase dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:Case owl:Thing wikidata:Q2334719
rdfs:label
Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
rdfs:comment
Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 575 U.S. 21 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "the Eleventh Circuit properly concluded that CSX's competitorsare an appropriate comparison class for the Railroad Revitalization and Regulation Reform Act of 1976's subsection (b)(4) claim." The Act prohibits states from imposing "another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier" and the Court found that the Eleventh Circuit "erred in refusing to consider whether Alabama could justify its decision to exempt motor carriers from its sales and use taxes through its decision to subject motor carriers to a fuel excise tax."
owl:differentFrom
dbr:CSX_Transportation dbr:Inc._v._Alabama_Department_of_Revenue
foaf:name
Alabama Department of Revenue, et al., Petitioners v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
dcterms:subject
dbc:2015_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Rail_transportation_in_Alabama dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_taxation_and_revenue_case_law dbc:CSX_Transportation
dbo:wikiPageID
48792926
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1096392255
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Associate_Justice_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:F.3d dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_575 dbr:Railroad_Revitalization_and_Regulation_Reform_Act_of_1976 dbr:N.D._Ala. dbc:2015_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Rail_transportation_in_Alabama dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_taxation_and_revenue_case_law dbr:F._Supp._2d dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eleventh_Circuit dbr:Alabama dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Certiorari dbc:CSX_Transportation dbr:CSX_Transportation
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7:infco20130701074 n8: n17: n11:13-553_1b82.pdf n7:infdco20120827939 n14:13-553
owl:sameAs
n10:2HHDu yago-res:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc. wikidata:Q24197343
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Portal dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Distinguish
dbp:dissent
Thomas
dbp:docket
13
dbp:joindissent
Ginsburg
dbp:joinmajority
Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Railroad_Revitalization_and_Regulation_Reform_Act_of_1976
dbp:oyez
n14:13-553
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
21
dbp:usvol
575
dbp:arguedate
0001-12-09
dbp:argueyear
2014
dbp:case
Ala. Dep't of Revenue v. CSX Transp., Inc.,
dbp:decidedate
0001-03-04
dbp:decideyear
2015
dbp:fullname
Alabama Department of Revenue, et al., Petitioners v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
dbp:holding
In determining sales tax discrimination, courts must view the state's tax scheme as a whole rather than just the challenged provision.
dbp:justia
n8:
dbp:litigants
Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
dbp:majority
Scalia
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n11:13-553_1b82.pdf
dbo:abstract
Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 575 U.S. 21 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "the Eleventh Circuit properly concluded that CSX's competitorsare an appropriate comparison class for the Railroad Revitalization and Regulation Reform Act of 1976's subsection (b)(4) claim." The Act prohibits states from imposing "another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier" and the Court found that the Eleventh Circuit "erred in refusing to consider whether Alabama could justify its decision to exempt motor carriers from its sales and use taxes through its decision to subject motor carriers to a fuel excise tax."
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.?oldid=1096392255&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3492
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.
Subject Item
dbr:Ala._Dept._of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transp.,_Inc.
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.
Subject Item
dbr:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v_CSX_Transportation,_Inc.
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Alabama_Department_of_Revenue_v._CSX_Transportation,_Inc.