An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Wright v. Rockefeller, 376 U.S. 52 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in cases involving allegations of improper racial gerrymandering, where the evidence was "equally, or more, persuasive" that racial considerations had not motivated the State Legislature, the Court will give deference to the findings of the District Court.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Wright v. Rockefeller, 376 U.S. 52 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in cases involving allegations of improper racial gerrymandering, where the evidence was "equally, or more, persuasive" that racial considerations had not motivated the State Legislature, the Court will give deference to the findings of the District Court. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 8971033 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11925 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1042895846 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1963 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Wright v. Rockefeller, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1964 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Douglas (en)
  • Goldberg (en)
dbp:fullname
  • Wright et al. v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • A New York statute that delineated the boundaries of the congressional district in Manhattan Island did not segregate eligible voters by race and place of origin in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment. Judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York affirmed. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Douglas (en)
  • Goldberg (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Warren, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Const. Amend. XIV; U.S. Const. Amend. XV; N.Y. State Law ยง 111. (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Wright v. Rockefeller (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Black (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • Judgment for defendants, injunction denied 211 F. Supp. 460 (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 52 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 376 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Wright v. Rockefeller, 376 U.S. 52 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in cases involving allegations of improper racial gerrymandering, where the evidence was "equally, or more, persuasive" that racial considerations had not motivated the State Legislature, the Court will give deference to the findings of the District Court. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Wright v. Rockefeller (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Wright et al. v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License