An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Withrow v. Williams, 507 U.S. 680 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Fifth Amendment Miranda v. Arizona arguments can be raised again in federal habeas corpus proceedings, even if a criminal defendant had a fair chance to argue those claims in state court. The Court rejected the state's argument that Stone v. Powell, a case holding the opposite in the context of Fourth Amendment claims on habeas review, applied in Williams' case.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Withrow v. Williams, 507 U.S. 680 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Fifth Amendment Miranda v. Arizona arguments can be raised again in federal habeas corpus proceedings, even if a criminal defendant had a fair chance to argue those claims in state court. The Court rejected the state's argument that Stone v. Powell, a case holding the opposite in the context of Fourth Amendment claims on habeas review, applied in Williams' case. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 27736056 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2354 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 895905339 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1992 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Withrow v. Williams, (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • O'Connor (en)
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1993 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Pamela Withrow, Petitioner v. Robert Allen Williams, Jr. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
  • Thomas (en)
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous ; White, Blackmun, Stevens, Kennedy (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Withrow v. Williams (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Souter (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 680 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 507 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Withrow v. Williams, 507 U.S. 680 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Fifth Amendment Miranda v. Arizona arguments can be raised again in federal habeas corpus proceedings, even if a criminal defendant had a fair chance to argue those claims in state court. The Court rejected the state's argument that Stone v. Powell, a case holding the opposite in the context of Fourth Amendment claims on habeas review, applied in Williams' case. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Withrow v. Williams (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Pamela Withrow, Petitioner v. Robert Allen Williams, Jr. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License