An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 (1985), was an important decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court explained how long police are permitted to stop vehicles as part of an investigatory stop before violating the Fourth Amendment. A seven-member majority of the Court determined the twenty minute stop in this case was legal, so the government won. However, the Court declined to adopt a bright line rule, deciding instead that "common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria." The Court announced that the rule for determining whether a detention is too long will depend on whether the police "diligently pursued" an investigation to quickly confirm or dispel their suspicions. The Court clarified that judges should avoid "unrealistic second-guessing" of

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 (1985), was an important decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court explained how long police are permitted to stop vehicles as part of an investigatory stop before violating the Fourth Amendment. A seven-member majority of the Court determined the twenty minute stop in this case was legal, so the government won. However, the Court declined to adopt a bright line rule, deciding instead that "common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria." The Court announced that the rule for determining whether a detention is too long will depend on whether the police "diligently pursued" an investigation to quickly confirm or dispel their suspicions. The Court clarified that judges should avoid "unrealistic second-guessing" of police and should take into account "swiftly developing situation[s]." Sharpe has been frequently cited, and is the framework used to challenge unduly prolonged police stops in thousands of criminal cases. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 63780592 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 20297 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1113477741 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1984 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. Sharpe, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Marshall (en)
  • Blackmun (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1985 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Stevens (en)
  • Brennan (en)
dbp:fullname
  • United States v. William Harris Sharpe and Donald Davis Savage (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • United States v. Sharpe (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Burger (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 105 (xsd:integer)
  • 172800.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:uspage
  • 675 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 470 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 (1985), was an important decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court explained how long police are permitted to stop vehicles as part of an investigatory stop before violating the Fourth Amendment. A seven-member majority of the Court determined the twenty minute stop in this case was legal, so the government won. However, the Court declined to adopt a bright line rule, deciding instead that "common sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria." The Court announced that the rule for determining whether a detention is too long will depend on whether the police "diligently pursued" an investigation to quickly confirm or dispel their suspicions. The Court clarified that judges should avoid "unrealistic second-guessing" of (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. Sharpe (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States v. William Harris Sharpe and Donald Davis Savage (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License