An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003), was a decision in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the United States Congress has the authority to require public schools and libraries receiving E-Rate discounts to install web filtering software as a condition of receiving federal funding. In a plurality opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that public school and library usage of Internet filtering software does not violate their patrons' First Amendment free speech rights and that the Children's Internet Protection Act is not unconstitutional.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003), was a decision in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the United States Congress has the authority to require public schools and libraries receiving E-Rate discounts to install web filtering software as a condition of receiving federal funding. In a plurality opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that public school and library usage of Internet filtering software does not violate their patrons' First Amendment free speech rights and that the Children's Internet Protection Act is not unconstitutional. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 18288798 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11960 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1109740556 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2003 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. American Library Ass'n, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Kennedy (en)
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2003 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Souter (en)
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • United States, et al., Appellants v. American Library Association, Inc., et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • Congress has the authority to require libraries to censor internet content in order to receive federal funding. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:joinplurality
  • O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • United States v. American Library Association (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:oralargument
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:plurality
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:prior
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 194 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 539 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003), was a decision in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the United States Congress has the authority to require public schools and libraries receiving E-Rate discounts to install web filtering software as a condition of receiving federal funding. In a plurality opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that public school and library usage of Internet filtering software does not violate their patrons' First Amendment free speech rights and that the Children's Internet Protection Act is not unconstitutional. (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. American Library Ass'n (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States, et al., Appellants v. American Library Association, Inc., et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License