An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), was a Supreme Court case argued and decided during the 2017 term of the Supreme Court of the United States. The case involved an interstate dispute regarding New Mexico's compliance with the Rio Grande Compact of 1938, an agreement which established a plan for equitable apportionment of the water in the Rio Grande Basin among the states of Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. The Court considered the question of whether the U.S. federal government had a legal right to join litigation against New Mexico; the Court ruled that the federal government was within its rights when it did so.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), was a Supreme Court case argued and decided during the 2017 term of the Supreme Court of the United States. The case involved an interstate dispute regarding New Mexico's compliance with the Rio Grande Compact of 1938, an agreement which established a plan for equitable apportionment of the water in the Rio Grande Basin among the states of Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. The Court considered the question of whether the U.S. federal government had a legal right to join litigation against New Mexico; the Court ruled that the federal government was within its rights when it did so. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 58942271 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11031 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1117213300 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2018 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2018 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 22 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado (en)
dbp:holding
  • Maryland v. Louisiana holds that the federal government has the right to intervene in legal cases regarding certain interstate compacts. In this case, the Court ruled that the Rio Grande Compact qualifies as a fitting compact because it relates to "distinctively federal interests". (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado (en)
dbp:majority
  • Gorsuch (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:uspage
  • ___ (en)
dbp:usvol
  • 583 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), was a Supreme Court case argued and decided during the 2017 term of the Supreme Court of the United States. The case involved an interstate dispute regarding New Mexico's compliance with the Rio Grande Compact of 1938, an agreement which established a plan for equitable apportionment of the water in the Rio Grande Basin among the states of Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. The Court considered the question of whether the U.S. federal government had a legal right to join litigation against New Mexico; the Court ruled that the federal government was within its rights when it did so. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado (en)
owl:differentFrom
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License