About: Texaco Inc. v. Dagher

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to a joint venture between oil companies to market gasoline to gas stations. The Court ruled unanimously that the joint venture's unified price for the two companies' brands of gasoline was not a price-fixing scheme between competitors in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court instead considered the joint venture a single entity that made pricing decisions, in which the oil companies participated as cooperative investors.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to a joint venture between oil companies to market gasoline to gas stations. The Court ruled unanimously that the joint venture's unified price for the two companies' brands of gasoline was not a price-fixing scheme between competitors in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court instead considered the joint venture a single entity that made pricing decisions, in which the oil companies participated as cooperative investors. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=5350726711917073372 https://supreme.justia.com/us/547/1/case.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/04-805
dbo:wikiPageID	4666482 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	7574 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	895903297 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:California dbr:Brand_name dbr:Joint_venture dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_547 dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California dbr:LexisNexis dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Class_action dbr:Gas_station dbr:Gasoline dbr:Consent_decree dbc:Texaco dbc:United_States_energy_case_law dbr:Board_of_directors dbr:Federal_Reporter dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbr:CCH_(company) dbr:Washington_(U.S._state) dbr:Western_United_States dbc:Royal_Dutch_Shell_litigation dbr:Lawyers'_Edition dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Federal_Trade_Commission dbr:Price_fixing dbr:Hawaii dbr:Attorney_general dbr:Texaco dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Oregon dbr:Certiorari dbr:Sherman_Antitrust_Act dbr:Illegal_per_se dbr:Summary_judgment dbr:Rule_of_reason dbr:Antitrust_law dbr:Shell_Oil dbr:Gas_stations dbr:Price-fixing dbr:US_antitrust_law
dbp:arguedate	0001-01-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-02-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Texaco Incorporated, Petitioner v. Fouad N. Dagher, et al.; Shell Oil Company, Petitioner v. Fouad N. Dagher, et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=5350726711917073372
dbp:holding	The pricing decisions of a legitimate joint venture between oil companies to sell gasoline to service stations did not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/us/547/1/case.html
dbp:litigants	Texaco Inc. v. Dagher (en)
dbp:majority	Thomas (en)
dbp:notparticipating	Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/04-805
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:uspage	1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	547 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:SCOTUS_URL_Slip dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:UnitedStatesCode dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:Texaco dbc:United_States_energy_case_law dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbc:Royal_Dutch_Shell_litigation dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to a joint venture between oil companies to market gasoline to gas stations. The Court ruled unanimously that the joint venture's unified price for the two companies' brands of gasoline was not a price-fixing scheme between competitors in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court instead considered the joint venture a single entity that made pricing decisions, in which the oil companies participated as cooperative investors. (en)
rdfs:label	Texaco Inc. v. Dagher (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Texaco Inc. v. Dagher yago-res:Texaco Inc. v. Dagher wikidata:Texaco Inc. v. Dagher https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4vFGN
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Texaco_Inc._v._Dagher?oldid=895903297&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Texaco_Inc._v._Dagher
foaf:name	(en) Texaco Incorporated, Petitioner v. Fouad N. Dagher, et al.; Shell Oil Company, Petitioner v. Fouad N. Dagher, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of	dbr:Dagher
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:547_U.S._1 dbr:Texaco,_Inc._v._Dagher dbr:Texaco_Inc._v_Dagher dbr:Texaco_v._Dagher
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:United_States_antitrust_law dbr:Dagher dbr:547_U.S._1 dbr:Public_service_law_in_the_United_States dbr:Texaco dbr:Texaco,_Inc._v._Dagher dbr:Texaco_Inc._v_Dagher dbr:United_States_v._Apple_Inc. dbr:Texaco_v._Dagher
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Texaco_Inc._v._Dagher