| dbo:abstract
|
- شفيق رسول (ولد في 15 أبريل عام 1977 في إنجلترا) واعتقل إداريًا خارج نطاق القانون والقضاء في معتقل غوانتانامو من قبل الولايات المتحدة ، وكان رقم الاعتقال التسلسلي الخاص به 86. اكتشفت عائلته اعتقاله عندما اتصلت بهم وزارة الخارجية البريطانية في 21 يناير 2002. وأطلق سراحه في مارس 2004 ، بعد حوالي ثلاثة أشهر من عودته إلى المملكة المتحدة قام برفع الدعوى القضائية المشهورة ضد حكومة الولايات المتحدة والمعروفة بـ . في أغسطس 2004 قام رسول بمعاونة عدد من المعتقلين السابقين منهم: آصف إقبال، وروهال أحمد بجمع الأدلة المتعلقة بتعذيب المعتقلين داخل غوانتانامو وتعرضهم للإساءة والإهانة من قبل المحققين والجنود. كما قام برفع دعوى قضائية ضد وزير الدفاع الأمريكي السابق دونالد رامسفيلد. أتاحت بوابة العدل بلاهاي الوصول إلى وثائق المحاكم الرسمية ذات الصلة بقضية رسول ضد بوش. (ar)
- Shafiq Rasul (born 15 April 1977) is a British citizen who was a detainee held at Guantanamo Bay by the United States, which treated him an unlawful combatant. His detainee ID number was 86. His family discovered his detention when the British Foreign Office contacted them on 21 January 2002. He was released in March 2004, shortly after his return to the United Kingdom, more than three months before Rasul v. Bush was decided. In August 2004, Rasul, Asif Iqbal, and Ruhal Ahmed, all from Tipton - and known as the 'Tipton Three' - compiled a report on their abuse and humiliation while in US custody. In Rasul v. Rumsfeld, plaintiffs Rasul, Asif Iqbal, Ruhal Ahmed, and Jamal Al-Harith, four former Guantánamo Bay detainees, sued former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. They charge that illegal interrogation tactics were permitted to be used against them by Secretary Rumsfeld and the military chain of command. The Hague Justice Portal gives access to the official Court documents related to the Rasul v. Bush case. In late February 2017, ISIL spokesmen issued a press release, stating that Jamal al-Harith, another former Guantanamo captive, had traveled to Iraq, and had used a suicide bomb to attack a military site there. Rasul denounced the attack, asserted that there was "no excuse" for the attack, and that he had been able to move past his experiences, and didn't understand why al-Harith hadn't. (en)
|
