An Entity of Type: work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Reference Re Amendments to the Residential Tenancies Act (NS), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 186 is a reference question put to the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the ability of the federal government to appoint judges under section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The Court considered that giving all of the jurisdiction of Superior Courts to other bodies would make s. 96 meaningless. Instead, the Court developed a three-part test to determine whether it is permissible for a provincial government to give powers of a Superior, or "Section 96" Court, to another provincial, or "section 92" court.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Reference Re Amendments to the Residential Tenancies Act (NS), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 186 is a reference question put to the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the ability of the federal government to appoint judges under section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The Court considered that giving all of the jurisdiction of Superior Courts to other bodies would make s. 96 meaningless. Instead, the Court developed a three-part test to determine whether it is permissible for a provincial government to give powers of a Superior, or "Section 96" Court, to another provincial, or "section 92" court. 1. * Is the power in question something over which Superior Courts had jurisdiction in 1867? 2. * Is the power in question a judicial function, rather than an administrative one? 3. * Is the removal of the judicial power the main point of the exercise, rather than just an ancillary part of a larger reform of the way that the jurisdiction is exercised? If the answer to all three of these questions is "yes", then it is unconstitutional to remove this power. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2780516 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2266 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1116705457 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Reference Re Amendments to the Residential Tenancies Act (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1996] 1 SCR 186 (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Lamer CJ (en)
  • Gonthier J (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1996-02-22 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket
  • 24276 (xsd:integer)
dbp:heardDate
  • 1995-10-05 (xsd:date)
dbp:history
  • APPEAL and CROSS‑APPEAL from (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Sopinka and Cory JJ (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Iacobucci and Major JJ (en)
dbp:majority
  • McLachlin J (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal allowed and cross‑appeal dismissed. (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1992 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Reference Re Amendments to the Residential Tenancies Act (NS), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 186 is a reference question put to the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the ability of the federal government to appoint judges under section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The Court considered that giving all of the jurisdiction of Superior Courts to other bodies would make s. 96 meaningless. Instead, the Court developed a three-part test to determine whether it is permissible for a provincial government to give powers of a Superior, or "Section 96" Court, to another provincial, or "section 92" court. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Reference Re Amendments to the Residential Tenancies Act (NS) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License