| dbo:abstract
|
- Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. Only cases in Oregon and Louisiana were affected by the ruling because every other state already had this requirement. The decision incorporated the Sixth Amendment requirement for unanimous jury criminal convictions against the states, and thereby overturned the Court's previous decision from the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon and Johnson v. Louisiana. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 12058 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-10-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
|
- Thomas (en)
- Kavanaugh (en)
- Sotomayor (en)
|
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-04-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh ; Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor ; Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:overturnedPreviousCase
|
- Apodaca v. Oregon , Johnson v. Louisiana (en)
|
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:questionspresented
|
- Whether the Fourteenth Amendment fully incorporates the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a unanimous verdict. (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires that guilty verdicts for criminal trials be unanimous. Only cases in Oregon and Louisiana were affected by the ruling because every other state already had this requirement. The decision incorporated the Sixth Amendment requirement for unanimous jury criminal convictions against the states, and thereby overturned the Court's previous decision from the 1972 case Apodaca v. Oregon and Johnson v. Louisiana. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| rdfs:seeAlso
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is dbp:overruled
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
