An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe, 164 U.S. 105 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the circuit court's decision was valid due to the case's diversity jurisdiction. They dismissed the case because a Supreme Court petition must invoke the Constitution or the laws of the United States, and the common law copyright claim did neither.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe, 164 U.S. 105 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the circuit court's decision was valid due to the case's diversity jurisdiction. They dismissed the case because a Supreme Court petition must invoke the Constitution or the laws of the United States, and the common law copyright claim did neither. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 59927868 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2120 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1018424293 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe, (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-11-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1896 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Press Publishing Company v. Monroe (en)
dbp:holding
  • Due to diversity jurisdiction, the circuit court's decision was valid. Dismissed because a Supreme Court petition must invoke the Constitution or the laws of the United States, and a common law copyright claim does neither. (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 17 (xsd:integer)
dbp:submitdate
  • 0001-10-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:submityear
  • 1896 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 105 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 164 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe, 164 U.S. 105 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the circuit court's decision was valid due to the case's diversity jurisdiction. They dismissed the case because a Supreme Court petition must invoke the Constitution or the laws of the United States, and the common law copyright claim did neither. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Press Publishing Company v. Monroe (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License