An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Pipher v. Parsell is a case that was decided before the Supreme Court of Delaware. It shows that a minor can be held to an adult standard of care when engaging in inherently dangerous activities such as driving.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Pipher v. Parsell is a case that was decided before the Supreme Court of Delaware. It shows that a minor can be held to an adult standard of care when engaging in inherently dangerous activities such as driving. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 55177547 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 4164 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1080035210 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:appealedFrom
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 2007-06-19 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullName
  • Kristyn Pipher, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Johnathan Parsell, Defendant Below, Appellee. (en)
dbp:judges
  • Myron T. Steele, Randy J. Holland, Carolyn Berger, Jack B. Jacobs, John W. Noble (en)
dbp:name
  • Pipher v. Parsell (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges
  • 5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Pipher v. Parsell is a case that was decided before the Supreme Court of Delaware. It shows that a minor can be held to an adult standard of care when engaging in inherently dangerous activities such as driving. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Pipher v. Parsell (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License