An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

P.F v G.O'M (Otherwise G.F) [2000] IESC 81 is an Irish Supreme Court case concerning the grounds of nullity of marriage.The court believe that adultery is not a reason for nullity of the marriage but did serve as a basis for legal separation. The court ruled that "consent" was not undermined where a party to the marriage had concealed misconduct. This case is thus significant for establishing the principles for annulment and clarifying the nature of consent.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • P.F v G.O'M (Otherwise G.F) [2000] IESC 81 is an Irish Supreme Court case concerning the grounds of nullity of marriage.The court believe that adultery is not a reason for nullity of the marriage but did serve as a basis for legal separation. The court ruled that "consent" was not undermined where a party to the marriage had concealed misconduct. This case is thus significant for establishing the principles for annulment and clarifying the nature of consent. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 61944449 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6818 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1082198573 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:appealedFrom
  • High Court (en)
dbp:appealedTo
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:caption
  • Grounds of nullity of marriage (en)
dbp:citations
  • [2000] IESC 81 (en)
dbp:concur/dissent
  • Mrs. Justice McGuinness (en)
dbp:concurring
  • Murray J., Geoghegan J. (en)
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 2000-11-28 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy
  • Mrs. Justice McGuinness (en)
dbp:dissenting
  • Mrs. Justice McGuinness (en)
dbp:italicTitle
  • yes (en)
dbp:judges
  • HC- O'Higgins, J SC- McGuinness J, (en)
dbp:keywords
  • family law (en)
dbp:name
  • P.F v G.O'M (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges
  • 3 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • P.F v G.O'M (Otherwise G.F) [2000] IESC 81 is an Irish Supreme Court case concerning the grounds of nullity of marriage.The court believe that adultery is not a reason for nullity of the marriage but did serve as a basis for legal separation. The court ruled that "consent" was not undermined where a party to the marriage had concealed misconduct. This case is thus significant for establishing the principles for annulment and clarifying the nature of consent. (en)
rdfs:label
  • P.F v G.O'M (Otherwise G.F) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License