An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249 is a judicial decision of the English courts relating to whether English law should refuse to recognise Nazi era laws relating to the appropriation of Jewish property. The courts considered the question whether the Nazi law was so iniquitous that it should refuse to recognise it as law, thus raising the "connection between the concepts of law and morality". The respondent, Frederick Cattermole, was HM Inspector of Taxes. In the House of Lords, Lord Cross of Chelsea famously held:

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249 is a judicial decision of the English courts relating to whether English law should refuse to recognise Nazi era laws relating to the appropriation of Jewish property. The courts considered the question whether the Nazi law was so iniquitous that it should refuse to recognise it as law, thus raising the "connection between the concepts of law and morality". The respondent, Frederick Cattermole, was HM Inspector of Taxes. In the House of Lords, Lord Cross of Chelsea famously held: a law of this sort constitutes so grave an infringement of human rights that the courts of this country ought to refuse to recognise it as a law at all. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 34413958 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 14483 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1119103589 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caption
  • Dachau concentration camp. (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1976] AC 249, [1975] 2 WLR 347, [1975] 1 All ER 538, [1975] STC 91, [1975] TR 13 (en)
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1975-02-05 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullName
  • Oppenheimer v Cattermole , Nothman v Cooper (en)
dbp:judges
dbp:keywords
dbp:name
  • Oppenheimer v Cattermole (en)
dbp:priorActions
  • [1972] Ch 585 (en)
  • [1975] 2 WLR 347 (en)
dbp:transcripts
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249 is a judicial decision of the English courts relating to whether English law should refuse to recognise Nazi era laws relating to the appropriation of Jewish property. The courts considered the question whether the Nazi law was so iniquitous that it should refuse to recognise it as law, thus raising the "connection between the concepts of law and morality". The respondent, Frederick Cattermole, was HM Inspector of Taxes. In the House of Lords, Lord Cross of Chelsea famously held: (en)
rdfs:label
  • Oppenheimer v Cattermole (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License