| dbo:abstract
|
- On 22 May 2007, the High Court of Australia handed down a judgment in the case of New South Wales v Fahy. The proceedings were started by Gemma Fahy, a former police officer in New South Wales, who sued the state for (amongst other grounds) failing to provide a safe working environment. The Court also considered whether , the main Australian test for a breach of duty of care, should be overturned - in the end, ruling that it remains good law. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 4092 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:appealedFrom
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:fullName
|
- State of New South Wales v Fahy, Gemma (en)
|
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:name
|
- New South Wales v Fahy (en)
|
| dbp:opinions
|
- ' Appeal upheld and decision in favour of the Plaintiff overturned, but with costs to be paid by the defendant, the State of NSW ( )
' The case of Wyong Shire Council v Shirt 146 CLR 40 remains good law regarding what is a "breach of duty of care" in negligence. ( ) (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- On 22 May 2007, the High Court of Australia handed down a judgment in the case of New South Wales v Fahy. The proceedings were started by Gemma Fahy, a former police officer in New South Wales, who sued the state for (amongst other grounds) failing to provide a safe working environment. The Court also considered whether , the main Australian test for a breach of duty of care, should be overturned - in the end, ruling that it remains good law. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- New South Wales v Fahy (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
