About: New Hampshire v. Maine

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

New Hampshire v. Maine, 426 U.S. 363 (1977), was an original jurisdiction case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the boundary between the states of New Hampshire and Maine was fixed by the 1740 decree of King George II of Great Britain. Both sides entered into a consent decree which was accepted by the special master appointed by the Court.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	New Hampshire v. Maine, 426 U.S. 363 (1977), was an original jurisdiction case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the boundary between the states of New Hampshire and Maine was fixed by the 1740 decree of King George II of Great Britain. Both sides entered into a consent decree which was accepted by the special master appointed by the Court. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/426/363/case.html https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/109477/new-hampshire-v-maine/ https://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep426/usrep426363/usrep426363.pdf https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/426/363.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=3048719184205719693 https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/426/363
dbo:wikiPageID	11954542 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	2666 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1063429461 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_426 dbr:Vermont_v._New_York dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:George_II_of_Great_Britain dbc:1977_in_New_Hampshire dbr:Original_jurisdiction dbc:1977_in_Maine dbr:Maine dbc:Internal_territorial_disputes_of_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_original_jurisdiction_cases dbr:Florida_v._Georgia_(1855) dbc:1977_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Special_master dbr:New_Hampshire dbr:New_Mexico_v._Texas dbr:Piscataqua_River_border_dispute dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-04-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1977 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	New Hampshire v. Maine, (en)
dbp:cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/426/363
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/109477/new-hampshire-v-maine/
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1977 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	White (en)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/426/363.html
dbp:fullname	New Hampshire v. Maine (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=3048719184205719693
dbp:joindissent	Blackmun, Stevens (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Burger, Stewart, Marshall, Powell, Rehnquist (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/426/363/case.html
dbp:litigants	New Hampshire v. Maine (en)
dbp:loc	https://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep426/usrep426363/usrep426363.pdf
dbp:majority	Brennan (en)
dbp:outcome	Consent decree stipulated between parties and agreed to by parties is permissible under Vermont v. New York, . States are not adjusting the boundary between them, which was fixed by the 1740 decree; the consent decree simply locates precisely the already existing boundary, and neither State is enhancing its power and threatening supremacy of the Federal Government. (en)
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:uspage	363 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	426 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:For dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1977_in_New_Hampshire dbc:1977_in_Maine dbc:Internal_territorial_disputes_of_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_original_jurisdiction_cases dbc:1977_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtOriginalJurisdictionCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	New Hampshire v. Maine, 426 U.S. 363 (1977), was an original jurisdiction case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the boundary between the states of New Hampshire and Maine was fixed by the 1740 decree of King George II of Great Britain. Both sides entered into a consent decree which was accepted by the special master appointed by the Court. (en)
rdfs:label	New Hampshire v. Maine (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:New Hampshire v. Maine wikidata:New Hampshire v. Maine yago-res:New Hampshire v. Maine https://global.dbpedia.org/id/Vzeg
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:New_Hampshire_v._Maine?oldid=1063429461&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:New_Hampshire_v._Maine
foaf:name	(en) New Hampshire v. Maine (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:426_U.S._363 dbr:New_Hampshire_v_Maine
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:426_U.S._363 dbr:Florida_v._Georgia_(1855) dbr:New_Mexico_v._Texas dbr:Piscataqua_River_border_dispute dbr:New_Hampshire_v_Maine
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:New_Hampshire_v._Maine