An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, 378 U.S. 52 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the self-incrimination clause in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that a state cannot compel a witness to provide testimony that may be incriminating under other State/Federal laws, even if it granted immunity under its own laws. Decided on the same day as Malloy v. Hogan (1964), the Supreme Court reconsidered its previous rulings that the Federal Government could compel witness testimony that could be incriminating under a state's laws, and states could similarly compel testimony that would be incriminating under Federal law.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, 378 U.S. 52 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the self-incrimination clause in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that a state cannot compel a witness to provide testimony that may be incriminating under other State/Federal laws, even if it granted immunity under its own laws. Decided on the same day as Malloy v. Hogan (1964), the Supreme Court reconsidered its previous rulings that the Federal Government could compel witness testimony that could be incriminating under a state's laws, and states could similarly compel testimony that would be incriminating under Federal law. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 60997739 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5705 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1094826376 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1964 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Murphy v. Waterfront Comm'n of N.Y. Harbor, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Black (en)
  • White (en)
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1964 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (en)
dbp:holding
  • The right against self-incrimination is not precluded by the grant of immunity from prosecution under state laws, when the testimony might be incriminating under the laws of another jurisdiction. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Stewart (en)
  • Clark (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Goldberg (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 84 (xsd:integer)
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 52 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 378 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, 378 U.S. 52 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the self-incrimination clause in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that a state cannot compel a witness to provide testimony that may be incriminating under other State/Federal laws, even if it granted immunity under its own laws. Decided on the same day as Malloy v. Hogan (1964), the Supreme Court reconsidered its previous rulings that the Federal Government could compel witness testimony that could be incriminating under a state's laws, and states could similarly compel testimony that would be incriminating under Federal law. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Murphy v. Waterfront Commission (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License