dbo:abstract
|
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance requiring door-to-door salespersons ("solicitors") to purchase a license was an unconstitutional tax on religious exercise. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 6330 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedatea
|
- 0001-03-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:arguedateb
| |
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania, (en)
|
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-05-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
|
- Reed (en)
- Frankfurter (en)
|
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- A Pennsylvania ordinance imposing a license tax for those selling merchandise when such material is religious in nature violates the Free Exercise Clause. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
|
- Jackson (en)
- Roberts, Frankfurter, Jackson (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Stone, Black, Murphy, Rutledge (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania (en)
|
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance requiring door-to-door salespersons ("solicitors") to purchase a license was an unconstitutional tax on religious exercise. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Murdock v. Pennsylvania (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |