About: Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that disclosure orders adverse to attorney–client privilege do not qualify for immediate appeal under the collateral order doctrine. This opinion is notable, as being the first Supreme Court opinion authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. In addition, this is the first time a Supreme Court opinion used the term "undocumented immigrant" - the term "illegal immigrant" having appeared in a dozen earlier opinions.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that disclosure orders adverse to attorney–client privilege do not qualify for immediate appeal under the collateral order doctrine. This opinion is notable, as being the first Supreme Court opinion authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. In addition, this is the first time a Supreme Court opinion used the term "undocumented immigrant" - the term "illegal immigrant" having appeared in a dozen earlier opinions. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/08-678.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/558/100/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1751/mohawk-industries-inc-v-carpenter/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-678.pdf https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=2581627296687243431 https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-678.ZS.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/2009/08-678
dbo:wikiPageID	25659297 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	5959 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1026013946 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:11th_Cir. dbc:2009_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Cohen_v._Beneficial_Industrial_Loan_Corp. dbc:United_States_attorney–client_privilege_case_law dbr:Attorney–client_privilege dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:Illegal_immigration dbr:Certiorari dbr:F.3d dbr:F._App'x dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-10-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2009 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, (en)
dbp:concurrence	Thomas (en)
dbp:cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-678.ZS.html
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1751/mohawk-industries-inc-v-carpenter/
dbp:decidedate	0001-12-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2009 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/08-678.html
dbp:fullname	Mohawk Industries, Inc., Petitioner v. Norman Carpenter (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=2581627296687243431
dbp:holding	Disclosure orders adverse to attorney–client privilege do not qualify for immediate appeal. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito; Thomas (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/558/100/
dbp:litigants	Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter (en)
dbp:majority	Sotomayor (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-678.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2009/08-678
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:subsequent	Carpenter v. Mohawk Industries, Inc., 479 F. App'x 206 . (en)
dbp:uspage	100 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	558 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Usc dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:2009_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_attorney–client_privilege_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that disclosure orders adverse to attorney–client privilege do not qualify for immediate appeal under the collateral order doctrine. This opinion is notable, as being the first Supreme Court opinion authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. In addition, this is the first time a Supreme Court opinion used the term "undocumented immigrant" - the term "illegal immigrant" having appeared in a dozen earlier opinions. (en)
rdfs:label	Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter yago-res:Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter wikidata:Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4s7WW
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Mohawk_Industries,_Inc._v._Carpenter?oldid=1026013946&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Mohawk_Industries,_Inc._v._Carpenter
foaf:name	(en) Mohawk Industries, Inc., Petitioner v. Norman Carpenter (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:558_U.S._100 dbr:Mohawk_Industries,_Inc._v_Carpenter
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Mohawk_Industries dbr:558_U.S._100 dbr:Mohawk_Industries,_Inc._v_Carpenter
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Mohawk_Industries,_Inc._v._Carpenter