dbo:abstract
|
- McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991), held that the right to counsel secured by the Sixth Amendment and the right to counsel protected by Miranda v. Arizona are separate and distinct, such that invoking one does not implicitly invoke the other. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 7059 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- McNeil v. Wisconsin, (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
| |
dbp:cornell
| |
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Paul McNeil v. State of Wisconsin (en)
|
dbp:holding
|
- Invoking the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not implicitly invoke rights secured by Miranda v. Arizona. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
| |
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Rehnquist, White, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
| |
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
|
- Defendant was convicted of murder, and the conviction was affirmed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari. (en)
|
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991), held that the right to counsel secured by the Sixth Amendment and the right to counsel protected by Miranda v. Arizona are separate and distinct, such that invoking one does not implicitly invoke the other. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Paul McNeil v. State of Wisconsin (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |