dbo:abstract
|
- McLaren v Caldwell was a landmark decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council that upheld provincial jurisdiction in matters of a local or private nature, as well as over property and civil rights. It has been described as "a decision in a non-constitutional legal context that had indirect non-legal, but profound, constitutional consequences." (en)
|
dbo:thumbnail
| |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 13716 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:appealedFrom
| |
dbp:caption
|
- The Duke and Duchess of York running the Chaudière timber slide on a timber crib, Ottawa, Ontario, 1901 (en)
|
dbp:citations
|
- [1884] UKPC 21, 9 AC 392 (en)
|
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
| |
dbp:decisionBy
| |
dbp:fullName
|
- Caldwell and another v McLaren (en)
|
dbp:judges
| |
dbp:keywords
|
- free use of waterways, provincial jurisdiction (en)
|
dbp:name
| |
dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
dbp:opinions
|
- Since 1849, the law in what is now Ontario has made public waterways of all streams, whether they are naturally or artificially floatable. Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada should be reversed, and that of the Ontario Court of Appeal restored. (en)
|
dbp:priorActions
|
- , reversing and restoring a decree of the Court of Chancery of Ontario (en)
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- McLaren v Caldwell was a landmark decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council that upheld provincial jurisdiction in matters of a local or private nature, as well as over property and civil rights. It has been described as "a decision in a non-constitutional legal context that had indirect non-legal, but profound, constitutional consequences." (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:depiction
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |