dbo:abstract
|
- Locke v. Karass, 555 U.S. 207 (2009), is a court case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Constitution permits the local chapter of a labor union to charge a "service fee" to non-members to cover non-local litigation expenses if (a) the expenses are "appropriately related to collective bargaining" and (b) there is a reciprocal relationship between the local chapter and the national union. The case expanded on and clarified the earlier Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association, which permitted such service fees for non-political activities but did not reach a consensus on whether "national" expenses were chargeable. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 7689 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-10-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
| |
dbp:concurrence
| |
dbp:cornell
| |
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-01-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Daniel B. Locke, et al., Petitioners v. Edward A. Karass, State Controller, et al. (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- The local unit of a union may assess non-members a service fee to cover national litigation if that litigation involves collective bargaining or other issues which could conceivably involve the local unit and if the payment by the local unit is reciprocal. (en)
|
dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
dbp:joinmajority
| |
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Locke v. Karass, 555 U.S. 207 (2009), is a court case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Constitution permits the local chapter of a labor union to charge a "service fee" to non-members to cover non-local litigation expenses if (a) the expenses are "appropriately related to collective bargaining" and (b) there is a reciprocal relationship between the local chapter and the national union. The case expanded on and clarified the earlier Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association, which permitted such service fees for non-political activities but did not reach a consensus on whether "national" expenses were chargeable. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Daniel B. Locke, et al., Petitioners v. Edward A. Karass, State Controller, et al. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |