About: James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] IRLR 296 is a legal case in the United Kingdom on the definition of a worker under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that lack of "mutuality of obligation" does not affect the status of being an employee, and therefore coverage under the 1998 Act.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] IRLR 296 is a legal case in the United Kingdom on the definition of a worker under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that lack of "mutuality of obligation" does not affect the status of being an employee, and therefore coverage under the 1998 Act. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2007/0475_06_2102.html
dbo:wikiPageID	15464563 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	2757 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1082976059 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:National_Minimum_Wage_Act_1998 dbr:United_Kingdom dbr:Employment_Appeal_Tribunal dbr:McMeechan_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Employment dbc:2007_in_British_law dbc:United_Kingdom_wages_case_law dbc:2007_in_case_law dbc:Employment_Appeal_Tribunal_cases dbr:Minimum_wage dbr:Worker dbr:UK_labour_law
dbp:citations	[2007] UKEAT 0475_06_2102, [2007] ICR 1006, [2007] IRLR 296 (en)
dbp:court	dbr:Employment_Appeal_Tribunal
dbp:dateDecided	2007-02-21 (xsd:date)
dbp:keywords	dbr:Minimum_wage dbr:Worker
dbp:name	James v Redcats Ltd (en)
dbp:opinions	Elias J (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:UK_law dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_Court_Case dbt:Clist_wage
dcterms:subject	dbc:2007_in_British_law dbc:United_Kingdom_wages_case_law dbc:2007_in_case_law dbc:Employment_Appeal_Tribunal_cases
gold:hypernym	dbr:Case
rdf:type	yago:WikicatUnitedKingdomWagesCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:WikicatEmploymentAppealTribunalCases
rdfs:comment	James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd [2007] IRLR 296 is a legal case in the United Kingdom on the definition of a worker under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that lack of "mutuality of obligation" does not affect the status of being an employee, and therefore coverage under the 1998 Act. (en)
rdfs:label	James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd yago-res:James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd wikidata:James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd https://global.dbpedia.org/id/ebpe
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd?oldid=1082976059&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:James_v._Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Uber_BV_v_Aslam dbr:James_v._Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:James_v_Redcats_(Brands)_Ltd