About: In re Neagle

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that federal officers are immune from State prosecution when acting within the scope of their federal authority.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that federal officers are immune from State prosecution when acting within the scope of their federal authority. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 4402390 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 4080 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1088284540 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedatea
  • 0001-03-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb
  • 5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1890 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • In re Neagle, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1890 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Lamar (en)
dbp:fullname
  • In re David Neagle (en)
dbp:holding
  • Section 3 of Art. II of the U.S. Constitution requires that the Executive Branch "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." The court determined that the appointment of bodyguards to Supreme Court Justices ensured the faithful execution of the law of the United States. The court also relied on a statute granting marshals "the same powers, in executing the laws of the United States, as sheriffs and their deputies in such State may have, by law, in executing the laws thereof." (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Fuller (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Bradley, Harlan, Gray, Blatchford, Brewer (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Const. Art. III, Sec. 788 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (en)
dbp:litigants
  • In re Neagle (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Miller (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Field (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 10 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 135 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that federal officers are immune from State prosecution when acting within the scope of their federal authority. (en)
rdfs:label
  • In re Neagle (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • In reDavid Neagle (en)
is dbo:knownFor of
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License