An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Holroyd v Marshall (1862) 10 HLC 191, 11 ER 999 was a judicial decision of the House of Lords. In that case the House of Lords affirmed that under English law a person could grant a mortgage or other security interest over future property, ie. property that they did not actually own at the time of granting the charge. Prior to decision, the generally accepted principle under English law was that pursuant to the nemo dat rule it was impossible for a person to convey a security interest in property which they did not own at the time of granting the charge.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Holroyd v Marshall (1862) 10 HLC 191, 11 ER 999 was a judicial decision of the House of Lords. In that case the House of Lords affirmed that under English law a person could grant a mortgage or other security interest over future property, ie. property that they did not actually own at the time of granting the charge. Prior to decision, the generally accepted principle under English law was that pursuant to the nemo dat rule it was impossible for a person to convey a security interest in property which they did not own at the time of granting the charge. The case is also notable in that no less than three persons who were, or one day would be, Lord Chancellor, gave judgments. It is also a rare example of one Law Lord interrupting another during their speech to object to a point in their judgment. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 53983880 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 9004 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1061917673 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:citations
  • 10 (xsd:integer)
  • 11 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 1862-08-04 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullName
  • Holroyd and Others v J.G. Marshall and Others (en)
dbp:keywords
  • (en)
  • Priority (en)
  • Security interest (en)
dbp:name
  • Holroyd v Marshall (en)
dbp:opinions
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Holroyd v Marshall (1862) 10 HLC 191, 11 ER 999 was a judicial decision of the House of Lords. In that case the House of Lords affirmed that under English law a person could grant a mortgage or other security interest over future property, ie. property that they did not actually own at the time of granting the charge. Prior to decision, the generally accepted principle under English law was that pursuant to the nemo dat rule it was impossible for a person to convey a security interest in property which they did not own at the time of granting the charge. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Holroyd v Marshall (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License