An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251 (2013), is a US patent law case. The case dealt with the question of jurisdiction of patent law litigation in regard to attorney malpractice. In a unanimous ruling, the United States Supreme Court decided that federal laws granting exclusive jurisdiction to cases involving patents does not preclude the ability of state courts to hear cases related to but not involving patents. The case was remanded to the Texas state courts for further proceedings.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251 (2013), is a US patent law case. The case dealt with the question of jurisdiction of patent law litigation in regard to attorney malpractice. In a unanimous ruling, the United States Supreme Court decided that federal laws granting exclusive jurisdiction to cases involving patents does not preclude the ability of state courts to hear cases related to but not involving patents. The case was remanded to the Texas state courts for further proceedings. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 43446670 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3288 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1096305264 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Gunn v. Minton, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 11 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Jerry W. Gunn, et al., Petitioners v. Vernon F. Minton (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • , which provides for exclusive federal jurisdiction over a case “arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents,” does not deprive the state courts of subject matter jurisdiction over a state law claim alleging legal malpractice in a patent case. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Gunn v. Minton (en)
dbp:majority
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:opinionannouncement
dbp:oralargument
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 17280.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:subsequent
  • Supreme Court of Texas overturned, remanded to Texas state courts for further proceedings. (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 251 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 568 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Gunn v. Minton, 568 U.S. 251 (2013), is a US patent law case. The case dealt with the question of jurisdiction of patent law litigation in regard to attorney malpractice. In a unanimous ruling, the United States Supreme Court decided that federal laws granting exclusive jurisdiction to cases involving patents does not preclude the ability of state courts to hear cases related to but not involving patents. The case was remanded to the Texas state courts for further proceedings. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Gunn v. Minton (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Jerry W. Gunn, et al., Petitioners v. Vernon F. Minton (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License