An Entity of Type: Person100007846, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Initially the Bush Presidency asserted that they did not have to release any of the Guantanamo captive's documents. They asserted that no captive apprehended in Afghanistan was entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention, and that those held in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base were not protected by US law either, because it was not on US territory. By September 2007 Eleven official lists have been released. Many captives names were spelled inconsistently on these lists.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Initially the Bush Presidency asserted that they did not have to release any of the Guantanamo captive's documents. They asserted that no captive apprehended in Afghanistan was entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention, and that those held in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base were not protected by US law either, because it was not on US territory. This position was widely criticized, and was challenged in the United States's Judicial System, with several cases eventually being heard before the Supreme Court of the United States. In Rasul v. Bush the Supreme Court overruled the Executive Branch, and clarified that the United States District Courts had jurisdiction to hear detainees' suits for writs of habeas corpus. By September 2007 Eleven official lists have been released. Many captives names were spelled inconsistently on these lists. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 13508593 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 26345 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1078313374 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:date
  • 2007-10-26 (xsd:date)
dbp:url
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Initially the Bush Presidency asserted that they did not have to release any of the Guantanamo captive's documents. They asserted that no captive apprehended in Afghanistan was entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention, and that those held in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base were not protected by US law either, because it was not on US territory. By September 2007 Eleven official lists have been released. Many captives names were spelled inconsistently on these lists. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Guantanamo Bay detainee documents (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License