About: Grady v. Corbin

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that: "the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep495/usrep495508/usrep495508.pdf https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/495/508.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=4377127661295599126 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/495/508/case.html https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112432/grady-v-corbin/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1989/89-474
dbo:wikiPageID	19087317 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	4949 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1110018873 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:1990_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Blockburger_v._United_States dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_495 dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:United_States_v._Dixon dbr:United_States_v._Felix dbr:Double_Jeopardy_Clause dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:William_J._Brennan,_Jr. dbr:Driving_under_the_influence dbr:Georgia_Law_Review dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Double_Jeopardy_Clause_case_law dbc:Overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume dbr:Ohio_Northern_University_Law_Review dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Loyola_Law_Review dbr:Thomas_Jefferson_Law_Review
dbp:arguedate	0001-03-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1990 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Grady v. Corbin, (en)
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112432/grady-v-corbin/
dbp:decidedate	0001-05-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1990 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	O'Connor (en) Scalia (en)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/495/508.html
dbp:fullname	William V. Grady, District Attorney of Dutchess County v. Thomas J. Corbin (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=4377127661295599126
dbp:holding	The Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted. (en)
dbp:joindissent	Rehnquist, Kennedy (en)
dbp:joinmajority	White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/495/508/case.html
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants	Grady v. Corbin (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep495/usrep495508/usrep495508.pdf
dbp:majority	Brennan (en)
dbp:overruled	. (en)
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1989/89-474
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York (en)
dbp:uspage	508 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	495 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:Fifth_Amendment_crimpro dbt:SCOTUS-stub
dcterms:subject	dbc:1990_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Double_Jeopardy_Clause_case_law dbc:Overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatOverruledUnitedStatesSupremeCourtDecisions yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Act100030358 yago:Action100037396 yago:Case107308889 yago:Choice100161243 yago:Decision100162632 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that: "the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted." (en)
rdfs:label	Grady v. Corbin (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Grady v. Corbin yago-res:Grady v. Corbin wikidata:Grady v. Corbin https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4kbWS
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Grady_v._Corbin?oldid=1110018873&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Grady_v._Corbin
foaf:name	William V. Grady, District Attorney of Dutchess County v. Thomas J. Corbin (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of	dbr:Corbin
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Grady_v_Corbin dbr:495_U.S._508
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_ca...ing_constitutional_criminal_procedure dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:United_States_v._Dixon dbr:United_States_v._Felix dbr:Double_Jeopardy_Clause dbr:Double_jeopardy dbr:List_of_overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions dbr:Grady_v_Corbin dbr:495_U.S._508 dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Corbin dbr:United_States_constitutional_criminal_procedure
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Grady_v._Corbin