An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt (short: Hyatt II), 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Nevada rule that does not extend the same immunities to agencies of other states as it does to its own is effectively a "policy of hostility", which is unconstitutional under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. The Court split equally on the question whether Nevada v. Hall should be overruled, effectively upholding it.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt (short: Hyatt II), 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Nevada rule that does not extend the same immunities to agencies of other states as it does to its own is effectively a "policy of hostility", which is unconstitutional under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. The Court split equally on the question whether Nevada v. Hall should be overruled, effectively upholding it. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 63969226 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2915 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1038371505 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-12-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2015 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Alito (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2016 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:docket
  • 14 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Franchise Tax Board of California, Petitioner v. Gilbert P. Hyatt (en)
dbp:holding
  • The Nevada rule not extending the same immunities to agencies of other states as it does to its own is a "policy of hostility" and unconstitutional under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Thomas (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt (en)
dbp:majority
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • ___ (en)
dbp:usvol
  • 578 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt (short: Hyatt II), 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Nevada rule that does not extend the same immunities to agencies of other states as it does to its own is effectively a "policy of hostility", which is unconstitutional under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. The Court split equally on the question whether Nevada v. Hall should be overruled, effectively upholding it. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt (2016) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Franchise Tax Board of California, Petitioner v. Gilbert P. Hyatt (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License